MINIMAL OR NO CANCER IN RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY SPECIMENS - REPORT OF 13 CASES OF THE VANISHING CANCER PHENOMENON

被引:74
作者
GOLDSTEIN, NS
BEGIN, LR
GRODY, WW
NOVAK, JM
QIAN, JQ
BOSTWICK, DG
机构
[1] CEDARS SINAI MED CTR,DEPT PATHOL & LAB MED,LOS ANGELES,CA
[2] MCGILL UNIV,DEPT PATHOL & LAB MED,MONTREAL,PQ,CANADA
[3] JEWISH GEN HOSP,DEPT PATHOL & LAB MED,MONTREAL,PQ,CANADA
[4] UNIV CALIF LOS ANGELES,DEPT PATHOL & LAB MED,LOS ANGELES,CA
[5] MAYO CLIN,DEPT PATHOL & LAB MED,ROCHESTER,MN
关键词
PROSTATE; ADENOCARCINOMA; VOLUME; BIOPSY;
D O I
10.1097/00000478-199509000-00003
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Early detection efforts identify prostate cancer at lower clinical and pathologic stages, often resulting in smaller volumes of tumor in radical prostatectomy specimens. In some cases, complete sampling of the radical prostatectomy specimen for biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma reveals minimal or no residual cancer. We evaluated the clinical and pathologic findings in 13 such cases in an effort to document this finding, which we refer to as the ''vanishing cancer phenomenon.'' The mean number of prostate slides examined per case was 79 (range, 34-248). Carcinoma was absent in two cases, present in a single focus in eight cases, and present in two foci in three cases. Mean cancer volume in the 10 cases with residual tumor was 0.019 cc (range, 0.003-0.038); the largest single dimension of any tumor focus was 3 mm. All cancers were well differentiated or moderately differentiated in the biopsy and prostatectomy. Our results indicate that in some cases cancer may be extremely difficult or impossible to find in the prostatectomy specimen despite exhaustive sampling. The incidence of this ''vanishing cancer phenomenon'' is probably increasing because more low-stage cancers are being treated by prostatectomy. The inability to identify cancer in a prostate removed for needle biopsy-proven carcinoma may not indicate technical failure.
引用
收藏
页码:1002 / 1009
页数:8
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [1] LYMPH NODE METASTASES IN EARLY CARCINOMA OF PROSTATE
    ARDUINO, LJ
    GLUCKSMAN, MA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1962, 88 (01) : 91 - &
  • [2] BABAIAN R J, 1988, Journal of Urology, V139, p178A
  • [3] BABAIAN RJ, 1991, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V67, P1418, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19910301)67:5<1418::AID-CNCR2820670524>3.0.CO
  • [4] 2-A
  • [5] COMBINING PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN WITH CANCER AND GLAND VOLUME TO PREDICT MORE RELIABLY PATHOLOGICAL STAGE - THE INFLUENCE OF PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN CANCER DENSITY
    BLACKWELL, KL
    BOSTWICK, DG
    MYERS, RP
    ZINCKE, H
    OESTERLING, JE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 151 (06) : 1565 - 1570
  • [6] GRADING ERRORS IN PROSTATIC NEEDLE BIOPSIES - RELATION TO THE ACCURACY OF TUMOR GRADE IN PREDICTING PELVIC LYMPH-NODE METASTASES
    CATALONA, WJ
    STEIN, AJ
    FAIR, WR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1982, 127 (05) : 919 - 922
  • [7] SAMPLING OF RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY SPECIMENS - HOW MUCH IS ADEQUATE
    COHEN, MB
    SOLOWAY, MS
    MURPHY, WM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1994, 101 (03) : 250 - 252
  • [8] PATHOLOGICAL AND CLINICAL FINDINGS TO PREDICT TUMOR EXTENT OF NONPALPABLE (STAGE-T1C) PROSTATE-CANCER
    EPSTEIN, JI
    WALSH, PC
    CARMICHAEL, M
    BRENDLER, CB
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 271 (05): : 368 - 374
  • [9] EPSTEIN JI, 1990, CANCER, V66, P1927, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19901101)66:9<1927::AID-CNCR2820660913>3.0.CO
  • [10] 2-Y