TUMOR PROLIFERATIVE FRACTION IN SOLID MALIGNANT NEOPLASMS - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF KI-67 IMMUNOSTAINING AND FLOW CYTOMETRIC DETERMINATIONS

被引:47
作者
SAHIN, AA [1 ]
RO, JY [1 ]
ELNAGGAR, AK [1 ]
WILSON, PL [1 ]
TEAGUE, K [1 ]
BLICK, M [1 ]
AYALA, AG [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV TEXAS, MD ANDERSON CANC CTR, DEPT CLIN IMMUNOL & BIOL THERAPY, HOUSTON, TX 77030 USA
关键词
PROLIFERATIVE FRACTION; KI-67; ANTIBODY; FLOW CYTOMETRY; MITOTIC RATE;
D O I
10.1093/ajcp/96.4.512
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Tumor proliferative fraction (TPF) has been shown to correlate with prognosis in some malignancies. A method for its determination that is practical, accurate, and reproducible is still being sought. In this comparative study of techniques, TPF values were determined in mirror-image samples of 126 consecutive solid malignant neoplasms using flow cytometry and immunostaining with Ki-67, a monoclonal antibody that recognizes an unknown nuclear antigen expressed during the entire cell proliferation cycle but not in resting cells. The mean TPF values for all cases were 19.5 +/- 15.6% (percentage of tumor cells stained) by Ki-67 (range, 1-86%) and 15.7 +/- 9.6% (S + G2M) by flow cytometry (range, 3-60%), which correlated significantly at r = 0.53 and P = 0.005. The correlation was less strong in tumors with low S-phase values (less-than-or-equal-to 10%, r = 0.28) than in tumors with intermediate and high S-phase values (r = 0.66). Ki-67 staining percentages did not correlate with patient age, sex, or tissue origin of the tumor. Ki-67 staining appears comparable to flow cytometry determination of TPF in solid malignancies with intermediate and high S-phase values. In tumors with low S-phase values, Ki-67 immunostaining shows higher TPF values, which perhaps reflect an increase in the proportion of G1-phase cells or dilutional effect of nonneoplastic cells in the tumors with low proliferative fraction.
引用
收藏
页码:512 / 519
页数:8
相关论文
共 48 条
[31]   EXPRESSION OF KI-67 - A PROLIFERATION-ASSOCIATED ANTIGEN - IN PROSTATIC-CANCER [J].
NILSSON, S ;
NORDGREN, H ;
EKLOV, S ;
LOGDAHL, M .
ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 1991, 30 (02) :177-179
[32]   THE CLINICAL-ASSESSMENT OF PROLIFERATION AND GROWTH IN HUMAN TUMORS - EVALUATION OF METHODS AND APPLICATIONS AS PROGNOSTIC VARIABLES [J].
QUINN, CM ;
WRIGHT, NA .
JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 1990, 160 (02) :93-102
[33]   FLOW-CYTOMETRY - METHODOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS IN PATHOLOGY [J].
QUIRKE, P ;
DYSON, JED .
JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 1986, 149 (02) :79-87
[34]  
SADLER DW, 1989, LANCET, V1, P785
[35]  
SASAKI K, 1988, CANCER, V62, P989, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19880901)62:5<989::AID-CNCR2820620525>3.0.CO
[36]  
2-U
[37]   A COMPARISON OF 3 METHODS FOR THE DETERMINATION OF THE GROWTH FRACTION IN NON-HODGKINS-LYMPHOMA [J].
SCHRAPE, S ;
JONES, DB ;
WRIGHT, DH .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1987, 55 (03) :283-286
[38]  
SCHWARTZ BR, 1989, AM J PATHOL, V134, P327
[39]   CORRELATION OF CELL KINETIC FINDINGS WITH MORPHOLOGY OF NON-HODGKINS MALIGNANT-LYMPHOMAS [J].
SILVESTRINI, R ;
PIAZZA, R ;
RICCARDI, A ;
RILKE, F .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1977, 58 (03) :499-504
[40]  
SWANSON SA, 1990, AM J PATHOL, V137, P1491