ROOT METAPHOR IN THE OLD AND NEW INDUSTRIAL-RELATIONS

被引:33
作者
DUNN, S
机构
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-8543.1990.tb00350.x
中图分类号
F24 [劳动经济];
学科分类号
020106 ; 020207 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Why have academic concerns and priorities within the old industrial relations paradigm seemingly wilted before the ideas of a new, more business oriented paradigm? I suggest that the answer lies partly in the relative appeal of their respective root metaphors. The metaphor of the old tends to be closed, static and pessimistic — industrial relations as trench war. The new offers a more hopeful, essentially American pioneering metaphor that conveys challenge and progress and makes a fetish of change. However, while I accept the inevitability of metaphorical devices in disseminating and even generating ideas in social science, the article warns against being seduced by the attractiveness of the metaphor rather than the robustness of the idea. © 1990 Blackwell Publishing Ltd / London School of Economics
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 31
页数:31
相关论文
共 117 条
[21]  
Black M, 1979, METAPHOR THOUGHT
[22]  
Black M., 1962, MODELS METAPHORS
[23]  
Block P, 1987, EMPOWERED MANAGER PO
[24]  
Blunden E., 1928, UNDERTONES OF WAR
[25]   CONTRASTING PHILOSOPHICAL-PERSPECTIVES IN ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE - A REPLY TO MORGAN [J].
BOURGEOIS, VW ;
PINDER, CC .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1983, 28 (04) :608-613
[26]  
Boyd R., 1979, METAPHOR THOUGHT
[27]  
Braverman Harry, 1998, LABOR MONOPOLY CAPIT
[28]  
Brown W., 1973, PIECEWORK BARGAINING
[29]  
BROWN W, 1981, CHANGING CONTOURS BR
[30]  
Brown WA, 1972, BRIT J IND RELAT, V10, P42