COMMUTING IN TRANSIT VERSUS AUTOMOBILE NEIGHBORHOODS

被引：234

作者：

CERVERO, R ^{[1
]}

GORHAM, R ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] UNIV CALIF BERKELEY,TRANSPORT ENGN PROGRAM,BERKELEY,CA

来源：

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION | 1995年 / 61卷 / 02期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1080/01944369508975634

中图分类号：

TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];

学科分类号：

0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;

摘要：

In recent years, there has been a chorus of calls to redesign America's suburbs so chat they are less dependent on automobile access and more conducive to transit riding, walking, and bicycling. This article compares commuting characteristics of transit-oriented and auto-oriented suburban neighborhoods, in the San Francisco Bay Area and in Southern California. Transit neighborhoods averaged higher densities and had more gridded street patterns compared to their nearby counterparts with auto-oriented physical designs. Neighbor hoods were matched in terms of median incomes and, to the extent possible, transit service levels, to control for these effects. For both metropolitan areas, pedestrian modal shares and trip generation rates tended to be considerably higher in transit than in auto-oriented neighborhoods. Transit neighborhoods had decidedly higher rates of bus commuting only in the Bay Area. Islands of transit-oriented neighborhoods in a sea of freeway-oriented suburbs seem to have negligible effects on transit commuting.

引用

页码：210 / 225

页数：16

共 27 条

[11]

Handy SL., 1992, BUILT ENV, V1978-18, P253

[12]

HOLTZCLAW J, 1990, 11TH P INT PED C CIT, P99

[13]

HOLTZCLAW J, 1994, UNPUB USING RESIDENT

[14]

Jackson Kenneth., 1985, CRABGRASS FRONTIER S

[15]

Kanafani A., 1983, TRANSPORTATION DEMAN

[16]

Katz P., 1993, NEW URBANISM ARCHITE

[17]

KULASH WJ, 1990, TRADITIONAL NEIGHBOR

[18]

*LUTRAQ CAMBR SYST, 1992, LUTRAQ ALT AN ALT

[19]

MCNALLY M, 1993, COMP ASSESSMENT TRAV

[20]

*MD NAT CAP PARK P, 1992, TRANS PED OR NEIGHB

← 1 2 3 →