MICROPROPAGATION OF SHORTLEAF, VIRGINIA AND LOBLOLLY X SHORTLEAF PINE HYBRIDS VIA ORGANOGENESIS

被引:22
作者
JANG, JC [1 ]
TAINTER, FH [1 ]
机构
[1] CLEMSON UNIV, DEPT FORESTRY, CLEMSON, SC 29634 USA
关键词
CULTURE MEDIA; MICROPROPAGATION; ORGANOGENESIS; SOUTHERN PINES;
D O I
10.1007/BF00033914
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Protocols were developed for the micropropagation of shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata Mill.), loblolly (P. taeda L.) x shortleaf pine hybrids, and Virginia pine (P. virginiana Mill.). For meristematic tissue induction, modified Gresshoff & Doy (GD) medium with a high concentration of benzyladenine (BA) and short pulse treatment was best for loblolly x shortleaf hybrids whereas a lower concentration of BA and longer pulse treatment was best for shortleaf and Virginia pines. Shoot growth rate for all species was generally slower on Schenk & Hildebrandt medium than on GD medium. Addition of activated charcoal improved shoot growth of shortleaf pine but not of Virginia pine or the loblolly x shortleaf hybrids. Separation of shoots was beneficial before placing in the advanced growth medium. Both GD and Litvay's media produced good advanced shoot growth, especially following the addition of 0.5% activated charcoal. Individual shoot heights of 2-3 cm and 8-12 weeks of age after separation from the cluster were best for rooting. Root induction declined rapidly thereafter. Modified GD medium with 0.5 mg l-1 alpha-naphthaleneacetic acid plus 1.0 mg l-1 3-indolebutyric acid and 20 g l-1 sucrose was best for root induction for all species except shortleaf pine. Addition of activated charcoal produced better root systems. Too high a light intensity resulted in a lowered frequency of rooting. A large number of plantlets was produced.
引用
收藏
页码:61 / 67
页数:7
相关论文
共 18 条
[11]   INFLUENCE OF A LOBLOLLY-PINE (PINUS-TAEDA L) - CULTURE-MEDIUM AND ITS COMPONENTS ON GROWTH AND SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS OF HE WILD CARROT (DAUCUS-CAROTA L) [J].
LITVAY, JD ;
VERMA, DC ;
JOHNSON, MA .
PLANT CELL REPORTS, 1985, 4 (06) :325-328
[12]   ROOT PRODUCTION AND PLANTLET DEVELOPMENT IN TISSUE-CULTURED CONIFERS [J].
MOHAMMED, GH ;
VIDAVER, WE .
PLANT CELL TISSUE AND ORGAN CULTURE, 1988, 14 (03) :137-160
[13]  
MOTT RL, 1981, N CAROLINA AGR RES S, V271
[14]   INVITRO DIFFERENTIATION OF PLANTLETS FROM EMBRYONIC EXPLANTS OF LODGEPOLE PINE (PINUS-CONTORTA DOUGL EX LOUD) [J].
PATEL, KR ;
THORPE, TA .
PLANT CELL TISSUE AND ORGAN CULTURE, 1984, 3 (02) :131-142
[15]   PLANTLET FORMATION IN PITCH PINE (PINUS-RIGIDA MILL) BY TISSUE-CULTURE METHODS [J].
PATEL, KR ;
KIM, HR ;
THORPE, TA .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 1986, 15 (02) :147-160
[16]  
REILLY K, 1977, NEW ZEAL J FOR SCI, V7, P199
[17]   PLANTLET FORMATION IN BLACK AND WHITE SPRUCE .1. INVITRO TECHNIQUES [J].
RUMARY, C ;
THORPE, TA .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE FORESTIERE, 1984, 14 (01) :10-16
[18]   INVITRO STUDIES OF ADVENTITIOUS SHOOT FORMATION IN PINUS-CONTORTA [J].
VONARNOLD, S ;
ERIKSSON, T .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE BOTANIQUE, 1981, 59 (05) :870-874