FUZZY-TRACE THEORY AND COGNITIVE TRIAGE IN MEMORY DEVELOPMENT

被引:20
作者
BRAINERD, CJ [1 ]
REYNA, VF [1 ]
HOWE, ML [1 ]
KEVERSHAN, J [1 ]
机构
[1] MEM UNIV NEWFOUNDLAND,ST JOHNS A1C 5S7,NEWFOUNDLAND,CANADA
关键词
D O I
10.1037/0012-1649.27.3.351
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
When children and adults retrieve words during unconstrained recall, it is commonly supposed that words will present themselves to consciousness in decreasing order of memory strength, which means that their order of readout should be stronger → weaker. In contrast, fuzzy-trace theory proposes a counterintuitive nonmonotonic relationship between order of readout and memory strength. This relationship, which we call cognitive triage, arises from the theory's interpretation of recall as a dynamic system in which the influences of three variables (memory strength, episodic activation, and output interference) must be balanced to maximize recall. Because fuzzy-trace theory anticipates ontogenetic variations in cognitive triage, we studied it developmentally. A series of nine experiments produced several findings that were consistent with the theory's assumptions: Children never recalled stronger words before weaker words, doing the reverse instead; the priority of weaker words over stronger words in output queues was observed in the earliest phases of learning in both younger and older children; as learning progressed and children secured more reliable information about the relative memory strengths of words, a weaker → stronger → weaker ordering emerged, and it emerged more rapidly in older children; at criterion, when all items were recallable, the weaker → stronger → weaker ordering was present at all age levels, although it was more pronounced in older children. We show how the theory's assumptions also explain some classic findings about the development of recall, especially subjective organization and serial-position effects.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 369
页数:19
相关论文
共 73 条
[31]   DEVELOPMENT OF FREE RECALL LEARNING IN CHILDREN [J].
COLE, M ;
FRANKEL, F ;
SHARP, D .
DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1971, 4 (02) :109-123
[32]   SPREADING ACTIVATION THEORY OF SEMANTIC PROCESSING [J].
COLLINS, AM ;
LOFTUS, EF .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1975, 82 (06) :407-428
[33]   RETRIEVAL TIME FROM SEMANTIC MEMORY [J].
COLLINS, AM ;
QUILLIAN, MR .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1969, 8 (02) :240-&
[34]   THE DEMISE OF SHORT-TERM-MEMORY [J].
CROWDER, RG .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1982, 50 (03) :291-323
[35]   ADDING NEW INFORMATION TO SEMANTIC MEMORY - HOW MUCH LEARNING IS ENOUGH TO PRODUCE AUTOMATIC PRIMING [J].
DAGENBACH, D ;
HORST, S ;
CARR, TH .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1990, 16 (04) :581-591
[36]  
DEMPSTER FN, 1990, UNPUB RESPONSE INHIB
[37]  
GHATALA ES, 1976, COGNITIVE LEARNING C, P61
[38]   A RETRIEVAL MODEL FOR BOTH RECOGNITION AND RECALL [J].
GILLUND, G ;
SHIFFRIN, RM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1984, 91 (01) :1-67
[39]   RECALL OF RELATED AND UNRELATED LISTS BY 2-YEAR-OLDS [J].
GOLDBERG, S ;
PERLMUTT.M ;
MYERS, N .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 1974, 18 (01) :1-8
[40]   SOURCES OF RECENCY EFFECTS IN FREE-RECALL [J].
GREENE, RL .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1986, 99 (02) :221-228