WHY TEACH THINKING - AN ESSAY

被引:91
作者
BARON, J
机构
来源
APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW-PSYCHOLOGIE APPLIQUEE-REVUE INTERNATIONALE | 1993年 / 42卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1464-0597.1993.tb00731.x
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Recent efforts to teach thinking could be unproductive without a theory of what needs to be taught and why. Analysis of where thinking goes wrong suggests that emphasis is needed on 'actively open-minded thinking', including the effort to search for reasons why an initial conclusion might be wrong, and on reflection about rules of inference, such as heuristics used for making decisions and judgments. Such instruction has two functions. First, it helps students to think on their own. Second, it helps them to understand the nature of expert knowledge, and, more generally, the nature of academic disciplines. The second function, largely neglected in discussions of thinking instruction, can serve as the basis for thinking instruction in the disciplines. Students should learn how knowledge is obtained through actively open-minded thinking. Such learning will also teach students to recognise false claims to systematic knowledge.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 237
页数:47
相关论文
共 74 条
[51]  
Perkins D. N., 1986, KNOWLEDGE DESIGN CRI
[52]  
Perkins D. N., 1981, MINDS BEST WORK
[53]  
PERKINS DN, IN PRESS THINKING
[54]  
Popper K., 1963, CONJECTURES REFUTAT
[55]  
PRESSEISSEN BZ, 1986, ANN M AM ED RES ASS
[56]  
Putnam H., 1981, REASON TRUTH HIST
[57]  
Reason J., 1990, HUMAN ERROR, DOI 10.1017/cbo9781139062367
[58]   SCIENCE IN COURT - A CULTURE CLASH [J].
ROBERTS, L .
SCIENCE, 1992, 257 (5071) :732-&
[59]   EFFECTS OF BELIEFS ABOUT THE NATURE OF KNOWLEDGE ON COMPREHENSION [J].
SCHOMMER, M .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 82 (03) :498-504
[60]  
SCHRAG F, 1988, THINKING SCH SOC