SAFETY RULES OK - POSSIBILITIES AND LIMITATIONS IN BEHAVIORAL SAFETY STRATEGIES

被引：36

作者：

HALE, AR

机构：

[1] Safety Science Group, Delft University of Technology, 2600 GB Delft

来源：

JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL ACCIDENTS | 1990年 / 12卷 / 1-3期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1016/0376-6349(90)90061-Y

中图分类号：

T [工业技术];

学科分类号：

08 ;

摘要：

The paper considers the basis for the development and use of safety rules imposed by a company or national organisation. It starts from a consideration of individual behaviour and error in terms of cognitive psychological theory. This postulates that behaviour is governed by individual "production rules". Imposed safety rules are only needed where individuals' own rules are not sufficient to prevent accidents. From a classification of error types it is possible to derive a classification of types of safety rules and to speculate both upon the characteristics which each type needs to have and on how and where they need to be developed and applied. The paper is illustrated by examples from a number of activities at individual, company and national level. © 1990.

引用

页码：3 / 20

页数：18

共 22 条

[11] Hale, Safety policy: Structure, framework and approach, Symposium Stichting Bedrijf en Overheid, Safety Science Group, Delft University of Technology, (1987)
[12] Hale, Stoop, What happens as a rule? Communication between designers and road users, SWOV Jubilee Conference on Traffic Safety theory and Research Methods, Amsterdam, 26–28 April 1988, (1988)
[13] Hale, Stoop, Human error models as predictors of accident scenarios for designers, CEC Workshop. Errors in the operation of transport systems, Cambridge, 26–28 May 1989, (1989)
[14] Hale, de Loor, van Drimmelen, Huppes, Safety standards, risk analysis and decision making on prevention measures: Implications of some recent European legislation and standards, J. Occup. Accid., (1990)
[15] Johnson, MORT Safety Assurance System, (1980)
[16] Komaki, A behavioural approach to work motivation, Occupational Accident Research: Proc. International Seminar on Occupational Accident Research, pp. 71-72, (1983)
[17] Leplat, Relations between task and activity: Elements for elaborating a framework for error analysis, CEC Workshop. Errors in the operation of transport systems, Cambridge, 26–28 May 1989, (1989)
[18] Michon, A critical review of driver behaviour models: what do we know and what should we know?, Human Behaviour and Traffic Safety, (1985)
[19] Rasmussen, Skills, rules and knowledge: Signals, signs and symbols and other distinctions in human performance models, IEEE Trans. Syst., Man Cybern., SMC, 13, pp. 257-267, (1983)
[20] Reason, Human Error, (1989)

← 1 2 3 →