Y-CONJUGATED COMPOUNDS - THE EQUILIBRIUM GEOMETRIES AND ELECTRONIC-STRUCTURES OF GUANIDINE, GUANIDINIUM CATION, UREA, AND 1,1-DIAMINOETHYLENE

被引:210
作者
GOBBI, A [1 ]
FRENKING, G [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV MARBURG, FACHBEREICH CHEM, HANS MEERWEIN STR, W-3550 MARBURG, GERMANY
关键词
D O I
10.1021/ja00059a035
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Ab initio calculations at the MP2/6-31G(d) level of theory predict that the equilibrium geometries of the Y-conjugated compounds guanidine (1), guanidinium cation (2), urea (5), and 1,1-diaminoethylene (6) are nonplanar. 1, 5, and 6 have energy minimum structures with strongly pyramidal amino groups. The equilibrium geometry of the guanidinium cation 2b has D3 symmetry; the planar amino groups are rotated by approximately 15-degrees out of the D3h form 2a. The planar structure 2a becomes lower in energy than 2b when corrections are made for zero-point vibrational energies. The observed planar geometries of guanidine and urea in the crystal are probably caused by hydrogen bonding. The resonance stabilization of the Y-conjugated structures is not very high, because the rotation of one amino group leaves a subunit which is isoelectronic to the allyl anion. Yet, resonance stabilization in the Y-conjugated forms is important, as it is revealed by the calculated rotational barriers for the NH2 groups and the substantial lengthening of the C-NH2 bonds upon rotation. The energy difference between 1,1-diaminoethylene (6) and 1,2-diaminoethylene (7) is mainly due to conjugative stabilization in 6. The two isomers have nearly the same energy when one amino group in 6 is rotated. The calculated proton affinity of guanidine is only 237.7 kcal/mol. It is concluded that the very high basicity of 1 in solution is not caused by the resonance stabilization of 2, but rather by strong hydrogen bonding of the guanidinium cation.
引用
收藏
页码:2362 / 2372
页数:11
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]   TRIMETHYLENEMETHANE DIANION AND THE CONTROVERSIAL NOTION OF Y-AROMATICITY [J].
AGRANAT, I ;
SKANCKE, A .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1985, 107 (04) :867-871
[2]   EVALUATION OF Y-DELOCALIZATION VERSUS LINEAR-DELOCALIZATION AND THE ROLE OF CHARGE ALTERNATION IN TRIMETHYLENEMETHANE DIANION AND BUTADIENE DIANIONS [J].
AGRANAT, I ;
RADHAKRISHNAN, TP ;
HERNDON, WC ;
SKANCKE, A .
CHEMICAL PHYSICS LETTERS, 1991, 181 (2-3) :117-122
[3]   PREPARATION OF A RANGE OF NNN'N'-TETRASUBSTITUTED 1,8-DIAMINONAPHTHALENES [J].
ALDER, RW ;
BRYCE, MR ;
GOODE, NC ;
MILLER, N ;
OWEN, J .
JOURNAL OF THE CHEMICAL SOCIETY-PERKIN TRANSACTIONS 1, 1981, (11) :2840-2847
[4]  
AMOS RD, 1987, CADPAC CAMBRIDGE ANA
[5]   PROTON MAGNETIC RESONANCE EVIDENCE FOR THE PLANAR STRUCTURE OF THE UREA MOLECULE [J].
ANDREW, ER ;
HYNDMAN, D .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE PHYSICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON SECTION A, 1953, 66 (408) :1187-1188
[6]   THE INFRA-RED SPECTRUM, STRUCTURE, AND NORMAL VIBRATIONS OF THE GUANIDINIUM ION [J].
ANGELL, CL ;
SHEPPARD, N ;
YAMAGUCHI, A ;
SHIMANOUCHI, T ;
MIYAZAWA, T ;
MIZUSHIMA, S .
TRANSACTIONS OF THE FARADAY SOCIETY, 1957, 53 (05) :589-600
[7]   THE BASIC STRENGTHS OF METHYLATED GUANIDINES [J].
ANGYAL, SJ ;
WARBURTON, WK .
JOURNAL OF THE CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1951, (SEP) :2492-2494
[8]  
AUE DH, 1979, GAS PHASE ION CHEM, V2, P16
[9]  
Bader R. F. W., 1994, ATOMS MOL QUANTUM TH
[10]   DESCRIPTION OF CONJUGATION AND HYPERCONJUGATION IN TERMS OF ELECTRON DISTRIBUTIONS [J].
BADER, RFW ;
SLEE, TS ;
CREMER, D ;
KRAKA, E .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1983, 105 (15) :5061-5068