Y-CONJUGATED COMPOUNDS - THE EQUILIBRIUM GEOMETRIES AND ELECTRONIC-STRUCTURES OF GUANIDINE, GUANIDINIUM CATION, UREA, AND 1,1-DIAMINOETHYLENE

被引:210
作者
GOBBI, A [1 ]
FRENKING, G [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV MARBURG, FACHBEREICH CHEM, HANS MEERWEIN STR, W-3550 MARBURG, GERMANY
关键词
D O I
10.1021/ja00059a035
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Ab initio calculations at the MP2/6-31G(d) level of theory predict that the equilibrium geometries of the Y-conjugated compounds guanidine (1), guanidinium cation (2), urea (5), and 1,1-diaminoethylene (6) are nonplanar. 1, 5, and 6 have energy minimum structures with strongly pyramidal amino groups. The equilibrium geometry of the guanidinium cation 2b has D3 symmetry; the planar amino groups are rotated by approximately 15-degrees out of the D3h form 2a. The planar structure 2a becomes lower in energy than 2b when corrections are made for zero-point vibrational energies. The observed planar geometries of guanidine and urea in the crystal are probably caused by hydrogen bonding. The resonance stabilization of the Y-conjugated structures is not very high, because the rotation of one amino group leaves a subunit which is isoelectronic to the allyl anion. Yet, resonance stabilization in the Y-conjugated forms is important, as it is revealed by the calculated rotational barriers for the NH2 groups and the substantial lengthening of the C-NH2 bonds upon rotation. The energy difference between 1,1-diaminoethylene (6) and 1,2-diaminoethylene (7) is mainly due to conjugative stabilization in 6. The two isomers have nearly the same energy when one amino group in 6 is rotated. The calculated proton affinity of guanidine is only 237.7 kcal/mol. It is concluded that the very high basicity of 1 in solution is not caused by the resonance stabilization of 2, but rather by strong hydrogen bonding of the guanidinium cation.
引用
收藏
页码:2362 / 2372
页数:11
相关论文
共 83 条
[21]  
CAPITANI JF, 1978, CHEM PHYS LETT, V54, P547
[22]   COVALENT BOND ORDERS IN THE TOPOLOGICAL THEORY OF ATOMS IN MOLECULES [J].
CIOSLOWSKI, J ;
MIXON, ST .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1991, 113 (11) :4142-4145
[23]  
CIOSLOWSKI J, 1991, BONDER
[24]   Y VS CYCLIC DELOCALIZATION IN SMALL RING DICATIONS AND DIANIONS - THE DOMINANCE OF CHARGE REPULSION OVER HUCKEL AROMATICITY [J].
CLARK, T ;
WILHELM, D ;
SCHLEYER, PV .
TETRAHEDRON LETTERS, 1982, 23 (35) :3547-3550
[25]   CHEMICAL-BONDS WITHOUT BONDING ELECTRON-DENSITY - DOES THE DIFFERENCE ELECTRON-DENSITY ANALYSIS SUFFICE FOR A DESCRIPTION OF THE CHEMICAL-BOND [J].
CREMER, D ;
KRAKA, E .
ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION IN ENGLISH, 1984, 23 (08) :627-628
[26]  
CREMER D, 1985, CROAT CHEM ACTA, V57, P1265
[27]  
DAMSGAARDSORENS.P, 1932, Z PHYS CHEM A LPZ, V160, P45
[28]   MOLECULAR-ORBITAL STUDY OF LITHIUM ION ASSOCIATION WITH BASES .1. CARBONYL BASES R2CO [J].
DELBENE, JE .
CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1979, 40 (03) :329-335
[29]   A VIBRATIONAL MOLECULAR-FORCE FIELD OF MODEL COMPOUNDS WITH BIOLOGICAL INTEREST .1. HARMONIC DYNAMICS OF CRYSTALLINE UREA AT 123-K [J].
DERREUMAUX, P ;
VERGOTEN, G ;
LAGANT, P .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 1990, 11 (05) :560-568
[30]   ON THE CRYSTAL STRUCTURE OF GUANIDINIUM BROMATE [J].
DRENTH, J ;
DRENTH, W ;
VOS, A ;
WIEBENGA, EH .
ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA, 1953, 6 (05) :424-424