THE ASSESSMENT OF MOTOR AND PROCESS SKILLS OF PERSONS WITH PSYCHIATRIC-DISORDERS

被引:43
作者
PAN, AW
FISHER, AG
机构
[1] COLORADO STATE UNIV,COLL APPL HUMAN SCI,DEPT OCCUPAT THERAPY,FT COLLINS,CO 80523
[2] UNIV ILLINOIS,COLL ASSOCIATED HLTH PROFESS,DEPT OCCUPAT THERAPY,CHICAGO,IL 60612
关键词
ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING EVALUATION;
D O I
10.5014/ajot.48.9.775
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objectives. The Purpose of this study was to examine the discriminant validity of the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) when used to evaluate a heterogeneous sample of subjects with psychiatric disorders. Method. Sixty subjects, ranging in age from 16 to 72 years, participated in this study, 30 were persons without disorders living in the community; 30 bad diagnosed psychiatric disorders. Two univariate F tests were used to test the hypothesis that mean AMPS measures would differ significantly between the group with and the group without psychiatric disorders. Results. The hypothesis was supported for both AMPS motor and process scale measures As would be expected among a sample that includes many higher functioning Persons, many subjects with psychiatric disorders did just as well as subjects in the group without psychiatric disorders Conclusions. Motor as well as process skill abilities of persons with psychiatric disorders should be evaluated. Because the AMPS provides more specific features than other global functional instruments, it can help clinicians plan treatment and intervention more effectively. Further examination of the motor and process skill deficits within and among diagnostic subgroups and of the effect of medication and prolonged hospitalization on AMPS motor and process abilities is indicated.
引用
收藏
页码:775 / 780
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   AGE-DIFFERENCES IN FUNCTIONAL PERFORMANCE [J].
DICKERSON, AE ;
FISHER, AG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 1993, 47 (08) :686-692
[2]  
DICKERSON AE, IN PRESS OCCUPATIONA
[3]   TEST-RETEST AND INTERRATER RELIABILITY OF A PROCESS SKILLS ASSESSMENT [J].
DOBLE, SE .
OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY JOURNAL OF RESEARCH, 1991, 11 (01) :8-23
[4]  
FISHER A, 1992, UNPUB ASSESSMENT MOT
[5]   FUNCTIONAL MEASURES .1. WHAT IS FUNCTION, WHAT SHOULD WE MEASURE, AND HOW SHOULD WE MEASURE IT [J].
FISHER, AG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 1992, 46 (02) :183-185
[6]   FUNCTIONAL MEASURES .2. SELECTING THE RIGHT TEST, MINIMIZING THE LIMITATIONS [J].
FISHER, AG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 1992, 46 (03) :278-281
[7]   THE ASSESSMENT OF IADL MOTOR-SKILLS - AN APPLICATION OF MANY-FACETED RASCH ANALYSIS [J].
FISHER, AG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 1993, 47 (04) :319-329
[8]   CROSS-CULTURAL ASSESSMENT OF PROCESS SKILLS [J].
FISHER, AG ;
LIU, YF ;
VELOZO, CA ;
PAN, AW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 1992, 46 (10) :876-885
[9]  
FISHER AG, IN PRESS OBJECTIVE M, V2
[10]  
Kielhofner G, 1985, MODEL HUMAN OCCUPATI