IMAGING-SYSTEMS EVALUATION - EFFECT OF SUBTLE CASES ON THE DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC STUDIES

被引:20
作者
ROCKETTE, HE [1 ]
KING, JL [1 ]
MEDINA, JL [1 ]
EISEN, HB [1 ]
BROWN, ML [1 ]
GUR, D [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV PITTSBURGH,DEPT RADIOL,PITTSBURGH,PA 15261
关键词
D O I
10.2214/ajr.165.3.7645495
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. Large-scale receiver operating characteristic (ROC) studies are expensive and time-consuming, If most of the difference in diagnostic accuracy occurs in a subset of subtle cases, considerable effort could be saved by restricting comparisons to this subset. We investigate the effect of subtle cases on diagnostic accuracy, the magnitude of error that can occur because of an imbalance of subtle cases in two groups, and the potential for sample size reductions if only subtle cases are used. METHODS. Data from a previous study of posteroanterior chest radiographs were reanalyzed separately for subsets of typical cases and subsets of subtle cases. Actually positive and actually negative cases were classified as subtle or typical and as difficult or easy for diagnosis of the specific abnormality. The area under the ROC curve (A(Z)) was used as the measure of diagnostic accuracy. Pairwise comparisons were done among three techniques and for the detection of nodules and interstitial disease. RESULTS. The performance index (A(Z)) was significantly (greater than or equal to 25%) lower for the subset of subtle cases as compared with the subset of typical cases. The difference in observer performance between two techniques was more often greater in the subset of subtle cases than in the subset of typical cases. CONCLUSION. The difference in diagnostic accuracy between the subset of typical cases and the subset of subtle cases is large enough that a difference in the proportion of subtle cases in two samples could result in clinically significant false differences in observer performance, Furthermore, the generally larger difference observed in the group of subtle cases suggests that sample sizes for some experiments could be reduced by 45-90% if the experiment were restricted to subtle cases.
引用
收藏
页码:679 / 683
页数:5
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
BRESLOW NE, 1980, STATISTICAL METHODS, P95
[2]   RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC RATING ANALYSIS - GENERALIZATION TO THE POPULATION OF READERS AND PATIENTS WITH THE JACKKNIFE METHOD [J].
DORFMAN, DD ;
BERBAUM, KS ;
METZ, CE .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1992, 27 (09) :723-731
[3]   PRACTICAL ISSUES OF EXPERIMENTAL ROC ANALYSIS - SELECTION OF CONTROLS [J].
GUR, D ;
KING, JL ;
ROCKETTE, HE ;
BRITTON, CA ;
THAETE, FL ;
HOY, RJ .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1990, 25 (05) :583-586
[4]   THE MEANING AND USE OF THE AREA UNDER A RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC (ROC) CURVE [J].
HANLEY, JA ;
MCNEIL, BJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1982, 143 (01) :29-36
[5]   FACTORS AFFECTING SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY OF EXERCISE ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY - MULTIVARIABLE ANALYSIS [J].
HLATKY, MA ;
PRYOR, DB ;
HARRELL, FE ;
CALIFF, RM ;
MARK, DB ;
ROSATI, RA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1984, 77 (01) :64-71
[6]  
METZ CE, 1990, 1990 ANN M AM STAT A
[7]  
Obuchowski N. A, 1995, ACAD RADIOL, V2, P522
[8]  
ROCKETTE HE, 1991, SOV PHOTOOPTICAL INS, V144, P276
[9]   STRATIFICATION IN NONPARAMETRIC ROC STUDIES [J].
SUKHATME, S ;
BEAM, CA .
BIOMETRICS, 1994, 50 (01) :149-163
[10]   DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY AND CONVENTIONAL IMAGING OF THE CHEST - A COMPARISON OF OBSERVER PERFORMANCE [J].
THAETE, FL ;
FUHRMAN, CR ;
OLIVER, JH ;
BRITTON, CA ;
CAMPBELL, WI ;
FEIST, JH ;
STRAUB, WH ;
DAVIS, PL ;
PLUNKETT, MB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1994, 162 (03) :575-581