DOSE OPTIMIZATION OF NONIONIC CONTRAST AGENT IN DYNAMIC COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY SCANNING OF THE ABDOMEN AND PELVIS

被引:1
作者
ALLEN, DA
STOUPIS, C
TORRES, GM
CALL, GA
LITWILLER, TL
ROS, PR
机构
[1] UNIV FLORIDA,SHANDS HOSP,COLL MED,DEPT RADIOL,DIV ABDOMINAL IMAGING,GAINESVILLE,FL
[2] UNIV BERN,INSELSPITAL,DEPT RADIOL,CH-3010 BERN,SWITZERLAND
关键词
COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; NONIONIC CONTRAST MEDIA; DOSE OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1016/0899-7071(94)90151-1
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100207 [影像医学与核医学]; 1009 [特种医学];
摘要
A prospective, randomized study was performed to examine the image quality of varying reduced doses of an intravenous (IV) nonionic contrast agent (ioversol, 320 mg/ml organically bound iodine) compared with the quality obtained using the maximum permissible dose (150 ml) of the same agent. Forty-five patients referred for abdominal-pelvic computed tomography (CT) scan were randomized into five groups to receive contrast doses equivalent to 100, 75, 65, 50, or 30% of 150 ml of contrast agent. The images were scored for diagnostic image quality in eight anatomical regions of interest and, in addition, quantitative analysis of density measurements were performed in the abdominal aorta and inferior vena cava. There was no statistically significant difference in either image quality, in any anatomical region, or in vascular density measurements between the group receiving 100% and the group receiving 75% of 150 ml of nonionic contrast agent. Patients receiving 65% and lower doses demonstrated a statistically significant decrease in enhancement, although all scans were diagnostically adequate. This study demonstrates that dynamic abdominal and pelvic CT scans obtained using a reduced dose of nonionic IV contrast agent are equivalent in diagnostic image quality compared with those scans obtained with the higher permissible dose of the same agent.
引用
收藏
页码:72 / 74
页数:3
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]
COMPARISON OF CONTRAST-MEDIA INJECTION RATES AND VOLUMES FOR HEPATIC DYNAMIC INCREMENTED COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY [J].
BERLAND, LL ;
LEE, JY .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1988, 23 (12) :918-922
[3]
DIAGNOSTIC EFFICACY OF EXCRETORY UROGRAPHY WITH LOW-DOSE, NONIONIC CONTRAST-MEDIA [J].
GAVANT, ML ;
ELLIS, JV ;
KLESGES, LM .
RADIOLOGY, 1992, 182 (03) :657-660
[4]
CONTRAST AGENT ENHANCEMENT IN ABDOMINAL COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY - IONIC VS NONIONIC AGENTS [J].
HALVORSEN, RA ;
DUNNICK, NR ;
THOMPSON, WM .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1984, 19 (05) :S239-S243
[5]
ADVERSE REACTIONS TO IONIC AND NONIONIC CONTRAST-MEDIA - A REPORT FROM THE JAPANESE-COMMITTEE-ON-THE-SAFETY-OF-CONTRAST MEDIA [J].
KATAYAMA, H ;
YAMAGUCHI, K ;
KOZUKA, T ;
TAKASHIMA, T ;
SEEZ, P ;
MATSUURA, K .
RADIOLOGY, 1990, 175 (03) :621-628
[6]
RESULTS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS OF LOW-OSMOLALITY VERSUS HIGH-OSMOLALITY CONTRAST-MEDIA [J].
KINNISON, ML ;
POWE, NR ;
STEINBERG, EP .
RADIOLOGY, 1989, 170 (02) :381-389
[7]
KUHN MJ, 1990, AM J NEURORADIOL, V11, P847
[8]
CONTRAST-ENHANCED CT OF THE LIVER AND SPLEEN - COMPARISON OF IONIC AND NONIONIC CONTRAST AGENTS [J].
NELSON, RC ;
CHEZMAR, JL ;
PETERSON, JE ;
BERNARDINO, ME .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1989, 153 (05) :973-976
[9]
COMPUTED BODY TOMOGRAPHY WITH IOPAMIDOL [J].
ROBBINS, AH ;
THURM, RH ;
YEH, T .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 1984, 19 (05) :S234-S238
[10]
COMPARISON OF IOHEXOL-240 VERSUS IOHEXOL-300 IN ABDOMINAL CT [J].
SINGER, AA ;
TAGLIABUE, JR ;
PAUSHTER, DM ;
BORKOWSKI, GP ;
EINSTEIN, DM .
GASTROINTESTINAL RADIOLOGY, 1992, 17 (02) :122-124