共 18 条
Planimetry of Orifice Area in Aortic Stenosis Using Multiplane Transesophageal Echocardiography
被引:105
作者:
Hoffmann, Rainer
[1
]
Flachskampf, Frank A.
[1
]
Hanrath, Peter
[1
]
机构:
[1] Klinikum RWTH Aachen, Med Clin 1, Pauwelsstr 30, Aachen, Germany
关键词:
D O I:
10.1016/0735-1097(93)90060-E
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the orifice area in aortic stenosis can be determined accurately and reliably by multiplane transesophageal echocardiography. Background: Monoplane transesophageal echocardiography has been used for planimetry of aortic valve orifice areas; however, obtaining a precise short-axis view is sometimes impossible. Methods: In 41 consecutive patients with known valvular calcific aortic stenosis (20 men, mean age 64 +/- 9 years), aortic valve orifice area was measured by planimetry using a multiplane transesophageal echocardiographic probe that allows full rotation of the cross-sectional plane. Results were compared with invasive measurements obtained by the Gorlin formula and areas determined noninvasively by transthoracic echocardiography using the continuity equation. Results: Multiplane transducer technology enabled the rotation of the cross-sectional plane from an exactly aligned long-axis view of the stenosed valve to a precise short-axis view without moving the tip of the echocardiographic probe, thus achieving an orifice cross section at a level predetermined in the long-axis view. Planimetry was feasible in 38 patients (93%). In three patients with pinhole stenosis (area determined by the Gorlin formula <0.4 cm(2)), the valve area could not be exactly delineated. Correlation between areas derived by transesophageal echocardiographic planimetry (0.56 +/- 0.31 cm(2)) and by the Gorlin formula (0.58 +/- 0.31 cm(2)) was excellent (r = 0.95; standard deviation of regression [SDR] = 0.054; Y = 0.92X + 0.085, where Y = Gorlin area and X = planimetry area). Correlation between Gorlin- and continuity equation-derived areas (0.65 +/- 0.46 cm(2)) was r = 0.79; for continuity equation- and transesophageal planimetry-derived areas it was r = 0.83. Severe aortic stenosis (valve area <= 0.75 cm(2)) was predicted with high sensitivity (96%) and specificity (88%). Conclusions: Multiplane transesophageal echocardiography is a practical and accurate clinical tool for the assessment of the severity of aortic stenosis.
引用
收藏
页码:529 / 534
页数:6
相关论文