In vitro cytotoxicity of solid epoxy-based dental resins and their components

被引:83
作者
Kostoryz, EL
Tong, PY
Chappelow, CC
Eick, JD
Glaros, AG
Yourtee, DM
机构
[1] Univ Missouri, Sch Pharm, Kansas City, MO 64108 USA
[2] Univ Missouri, Sch Dent, Kansas City, MO 64108 USA
[3] Midwest Res Inst, Kansas City, MO 64110 USA
关键词
cytotoxicity; dental material; composite resin; epoxy resin; spiroorthocarbonate; agar diffusion; polyols; resin extracts; dental monomer; Bisphenol-A diglycidyl dimethacrylate;
D O I
10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00058-5
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 [口腔医学];
摘要
Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of adding a spiroorthocarbonate (SOC) or a polyol on the cytotoxicity of epoxy-based dental resins. Methods: Resins contained one of the epoxies: diglycidyl ether Bisphenol A (GY-6004); 3,4-epoxycyclohexanemethyl-3,4-epoxycyclohexane carboxylate (UVR-6105); vinyl cyclohexane dioxide (ERL-4206) or the three-epoxy mixture (Epoxy-M). The SOC was t/t-2,3,8,9-di(tetramethylene)-1,5,7,11-tetraoxaspiro[5.5]undecane (SOC). The polyols were polytetrahydrofuran (p-THF-250) and polycaprolactone triol (TONE-301). The photoinitiator (4-octylphenyl)phenyliodonium hexafluoroantimonate and camphorquinone were used for light curing the resins. Four types of resins (epoxy, SOC/epoxy, polyol/epoxy and SOC/polyol/epoxy) were evaluated for cytotoxicity as solids in the agar diffusion assay and as aqueous extracts in the MTT assay using L929 cells. Results: In agar diffusion analysis, ERL-4206 and UVR-6105 resins were severely cytotoxic (+ + +), but the addition of SOC changed them to non-cytotoxic (-). Addition of 1-3% SOC changed Epoxy-M from mild (+) to non-cytotoxic. Adding SOC changed GY-6004 from moderate (+ +) to mild (-) cytotoxicity. Generally, addition of SOC did not change cytotoxicity when added to polyol/epoxy combinations. Either polyol produced resins with reduced cytotoxicity when added to UVR-6105, but the opposite occurred when added to Epoxy-M resins. In MTT analysis, percent cell survival from 100 mu l resin extracts were statistically compared (ANOVA, p < 0.05). Epoxy-M and GY-6004 resin extracts were significantly less cytotoxic than UVR-6105 and ERL-4206 resin extracts were. Overall, the SOC component reduced the cytotoxicity of all SOC/epoxy combinations, except SOC/ERL-4206, which was significantly more cytotoxic than ERL-4206 resin extract. This may be the result of cell fixative effects observed for SOC/ERL-4206 in agar diffusion analysis. Addition of SOC produced significantly less cytotoxic SOC/polyol/Epoxy-M resins when compared to its non-SOC counterpart. The contrary result was obtained with SOC/polyol/UVR-6105 resin combinations. Consistent with agar diffusion results, adding polyol significantly decreased cytotoxicity of UVR-6105 resins. The cytotoxicity of these resins may be related to the 50% cytotoxicity (TC50) of their components as leachates. The TC50 values of the individual components were compared to BISGMA. Polyols, epoxy monomers, SOC monomer and camphorquinone were significantly(p < 0.05) less cytotoxic than BISGMA. Significance: Addition of SOCs and polyols in the formulation of epoxy-based resins may contribute to development of biocompatible dental composites. (C) 1999 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:363 / 373
页数:11
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 1997, 7405 ISO
[2]
Comparison of tetrazolium colorimetric and Cr-51 release assays for cytotoxicity determination of dental biomaterials [J].
Bean, TA ;
Zhuang, WC ;
Tong, PY ;
Eick, JD ;
Chappelow, CC ;
Yourtee, DM .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1995, 11 (5-6) :327-331
[3]
PROPERTIES OF EXPANDING SOC/EPOXY COPOLYMERS FOR DENTAL USE IN DENTAL COMPOSITES [J].
EICK, JD ;
BYERLEY, TJ ;
CHAPPELL, RP ;
CHEN, GR ;
BOWLES, CQ ;
CHAPPELOW, CC .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1993, 9 (02) :123-127
[4]
Component release from light-activated glass ionomer and compomer cements [J].
Hamid, A ;
Okamoto, A ;
Iwaku, M ;
Hume, WR .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 1998, 25 (02) :94-99
[5]
CYTO-TOXIC EFFECTS OF DENTAL CEMENTS ON 2 CELL-CULTURE SYSTEMS [J].
HANKS, CT ;
ANDERSON, M ;
CRAIG, RG .
JOURNAL OF ORAL PATHOLOGY & MEDICINE, 1981, 10 (02) :101-112
[6]
CYTOTOXIC EFFECTS OF RESIN COMPONENTS ON CULTURED MAMMALIAN FIBROBLASTS [J].
HANKS, CT ;
STRAWN, SE ;
WATAHA, JC ;
CRAIG, RG .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1991, 70 (11) :1450-1455
[7]
Elements of light-cured epoxy-based dental polymer systems [J].
Millich, F ;
Jeang, L ;
Eick, JD ;
Chappelow, CC ;
Pinzino, CS .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1998, 77 (04) :603-608
[9]
IN-VITRO EVALUATION OF CYTOTOXICITY OF DIEPOXY COMPOUNDS USED FOR BIOMATERIAL MODIFICATION [J].
NISHI, C ;
NAKAJIMA, N ;
IKADA, Y .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH, 1995, 29 (07) :829-834
[10]
Estrogenicity of resin-based composites and sealants used in dentistry [J].
Olea, N ;
Pulgar, R ;
Perez, P ;
OleaSerrano, F ;
Rivas, A ;
NovilloFertrell, A ;
Pedraza, V ;
Soto, AM ;
Sonnenschein, C .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 1996, 104 (03) :298-305