EXPLAINING NEW-DEAL LABOR POLICY

被引:26
作者
SKOCPOL, T
FINEGOLD, K
GOLDFIELD, M
机构
[1] RUTGERS STATE UNIV,NEW BRUNSWICK,NJ 08903
[2] CORNELL UNIV,ITHACA,NY 14853
关键词
D O I
10.2307/1963265
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) of 1935 represented a turning point in modern labor relations policy in the United States. In the December 1989 issue of this Review, Michael Goldfield examined the effects of worker insurgency and radical organization on the enactment of the new labor law and rejected theories that emphasized the autonomy of the state from societal forces. In this Controversy, Theda Skocpol and Kenneth Finegold argue that the growing strength of liberal Democrats in Congress following the 1934 election and the failure of the National Industrial Recovery Act (NIRA) as an economic recovery measure provided the most important causes for the passage of the NLRA in mid-1935. In response Goldfield argues that the results of the 1934 election were themselves influenced by the protest environment and that the passage of the NLRA was a foregone conclusion before the NIRA was struck down. © 1990, American Political Science Association. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1297 / 1315
页数:19
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
ANDERSEN K, 1979, CREATION DEMOCRATIC
[2]  
Bernstein Irving, 1969, TURBULENT YEARS HIST
[3]  
Bernstein Irving, 1950, NEW DEAL COLLECTIVE
[4]   MASS DYNAMICS OF UNITED-STATES PRESIDENTIAL COMPETITIONS, 1928-1936 [J].
BROWN, C .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1988, 82 (04) :1153-1181
[5]  
*C IND ORG, 1989, 2ND P COUST CONV
[6]  
*C IND ORG, 1941, 4TH P CONST CONV
[7]  
CAMMACK P, 1988, BRIT J POLIT SCI, V19, P261
[8]  
Casebeer Kenneth, 1989, IND RELAT LAW J, V11, P73
[9]  
CASEBEER KM, 1987, U MIAMI LAW REV, V42, P261
[10]  
DOMHOFF GW, 1970, HIGHER CIRCLES