EXPLAINING NEW-DEAL LABOR POLICY

被引:26
作者
SKOCPOL, T
FINEGOLD, K
GOLDFIELD, M
机构
[1] RUTGERS STATE UNIV,NEW BRUNSWICK,NJ 08903
[2] CORNELL UNIV,ITHACA,NY 14853
关键词
D O I
10.2307/1963265
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) of 1935 represented a turning point in modern labor relations policy in the United States. In the December 1989 issue of this Review, Michael Goldfield examined the effects of worker insurgency and radical organization on the enactment of the new labor law and rejected theories that emphasized the autonomy of the state from societal forces. In this Controversy, Theda Skocpol and Kenneth Finegold argue that the growing strength of liberal Democrats in Congress following the 1934 election and the failure of the National Industrial Recovery Act (NIRA) as an economic recovery measure provided the most important causes for the passage of the NLRA in mid-1935. In response Goldfield argues that the results of the 1934 election were themselves influenced by the protest environment and that the passage of the NLRA was a foregone conclusion before the NIRA was struck down. © 1990, American Political Science Association. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1297 / 1315
页数:19
相关论文
共 47 条
[21]  
HUTHMACHER J, 1968, RE WAGNER RISE URBAN
[22]  
Johnson Hugh S., 1935, BLUE EAGLE EGG EARTH
[23]  
KEENSEN J, 1986, HDB LABOR EC
[24]  
Keeran R., 1980, COMMUNIST PARTY AUTO
[25]   A THEORY OF CRITICAL ELECTIONS [J].
Key, V. O., Jr. .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 1955, 17 (01) :3-18
[26]  
Klehr Harvey, 1984, HEYDAY AM COMMUNISM
[27]  
KORTH PA, 1988, REMEMBER TODAY AUTO
[28]  
Levine R, 1988, CLASS STRUGGLE NEW D
[29]  
Lichtenstein N., 1982, LABORS WAR HOME CIO
[30]  
Lynd Alice, 1973, RANK FILE PERSONAL H