THE ROLE OF DISTRACTION IN IMPROVING THE SPACE AVAILABLE FOR THE CORD IN CERVICAL SPONDYLOSIS

被引:52
作者
BAYLEY, JC
YOO, JU
KRUGER, DM
SCHLEGEL, J
机构
[1] Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, MA
[2] Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH
[3] University of Connecticut, Hartford, CT
[4] Deparcment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT
关键词
CERVICAL SPINE; DISTRACTION; MYELOPATHY; SPONDYLOSIS;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-199504000-00005
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. This study analyzed the effects of distraction via strut graft insertion on the canal dimensions in spondylotic human cadaver cervical spines. Transverse and anteroposterior diameters and cross-sectional areas were measured by transverse computed tomography imaging before and after distraction without direct decompression. Objectives. This experiment was designed to address whether distraction across the disc space without direct canal decompression can improve the space available for the cord. Summary of Background Data. Smith-Robinson anterior discectomy and fusion have been shown to improve clinical symptoms of radiculopathy and myelopathy in the absence of direct decompression. This has been postulated to be the result of gradual resorption of intruding osteophytes. However, the immediate effects of indirect distraction alone have not been previously investigated. Methods. Four cadaver spines from elderly donors were harvested intact. The transverse diameter, anteroposterior diameter, and cross-sectional area of the spinal canal were measured before and after discectomy and distraction via insertion of fibular strut graft by digitization of contiguous computed tomography scan slices. Results. The spinal canal dimensions before distraction were found to vary in a sinusoidal pattern around the disc space, with the maximum measurements located at the pedicle and the minimum measurements at the spondylotic ridge above or below the disc space. Distraction via strut graft insertion significantly increased the anteroposterior diameter and cross-sectional area, but had a negligible effect on transverse diameter. Conclusions. Anterior discectomy and distraction with a strut graft can significantly improve the space available for the cord in cervical spondylosis. Osteophyte debridement, which risks iatrogenic injury to the cord, may not always be necessary for improving clinical radiculopathy and myelopathy.
引用
收藏
页码:771 / 775
页数:5
相关论文
共 28 条
[11]  
Eismont F.J., Clifford S., Goldberg M., Green B., Cervical sagittal spinal canal size in spine injury, Spine, 9, pp. 663-666, (1984)
[12]  
Epstein J.A., The surgical management of cervical spinal stenosis, spondylosis, and myeloradiculopathy by means of the posterior approach, Spine, 13, pp. 864-869, (1988)
[13]  
Epstein N.E., Epstein J.A., Carras A., Cervical spondylosis, stenosis and myeloradiculopathy in patients over 65: Diagnostic techniques and management, Neuro-Orthopedics, 6, pp. 13-23, (1988)
[14]  
Galera R., Tovi D., Anterior disc excision with interbody fusion in cervical spondylotic myelopathy and rhizopathy, J Neurosurg, 28, pp. 305-310, (1968)
[15]  
Graham J.J., Complications of cervical spine surgery: A five year report on a survey of the membership of the cervical spine research society by the morbidity and mortality committee, Spine, 14, pp. 1046-1050, (1989)
[16]  
Holt S., Yates P.O., Cervical spondylosis and nerve root lesions: Incidence at routine necropsy, J Bone Joint Surg [Br], 48, pp. 407-423, (1966)
[17]  
Martins A.N., Anterior cervical discectomy with and without interbody bone graft, J Neurosurg, 44, pp. 290-295, (1976)
[18]  
Matsuura P., Waters R.L., Adkins R.H., Et al., Comparison of computerized tomography parameters of the cervical spine in normal control subjects and spinal cord injured patients, J Bone Joint Surg [Am], 71, pp. 183-188, (1989)
[19]  
Ogino H., Tada K., Okada K., Et al., Canal diameter, an-teroposterior compression ratio, and spondylotic myelopathy of the cervical spine, Spine, 8, pp. 1-15, (1983)
[20]  
Robinson R.A., Afeiche N., Dunn E.J., Northrup B.E., Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: Etiology and treatment concepts, Spine, 2, pp. 89-99, (1977)