TREATMENT PHILOSOPHY AND RETREATMENT RATES FOLLOWING PIEZOELECTRIC LITHOTRIPSY

被引:4
作者
FEGAN, J [1 ]
CAMP, LA [1 ]
WILSON, WT [1 ]
MILLER, GL [1 ]
PREMINGER, GM [1 ]
机构
[1] UNIV TEXAS,SW MED CTR,DEPT RADIOL,DALLAS,TX 75230
关键词
EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCKWAVE LITHOTRIPSY; URINARY CALCULI; LITHOTRIPSY;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-5347(17)35984-0
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Second generation lithotriptors offer the advantage of anesthesia-free fragmentation of renal and ureteral calculi but they frequently require multiple treatments to attain a stone-free status. However, excessive single lithotripsy sessions or multiple treatments may be associated with significant damage to the kidney. For some clinicians a common treatment philosophy involves evaluation of serial plain abdominal films every 24 hours after lithotripsy and immediate retreatment of all patients with incomplete fragmentation. To avoid unnecessary retreatments and, thus, minimize potential renal damage, we prospectively evaluated 100 patients undergoing lithotripsy on a Wolf Piezolith 2300 device. Patients were routinely treated with 4,000 shocks at 1,100 bar. Serial plain abdominal films were obtained at 1 day and 2 weeks after lithotripsy. The need for retreatment was determined by the plain abdominal film results. Additional therapy was considered necessary if there was no stone fragmentation or if residual fragments measured greater than 4 mm. Of the patients whose plain abdominal film at 24 hours indicated the need for a repeat treatment 43% were stone-free on the 2-week film. Thus, these patients were spared an unnecessary treatment by allowing adequate time for the stone fragments to pass spontaneously. Our data suggest that repeat treatments on second generation lithotriptors should not be performed within 24 hours. Rather, the patient should be reevaluated at least 1 to 2 weeks later to avoid unnecessary retreatment with the attendant potential for renal injury. In addition, when comparing the retreatment rates of various lithotriptors, one should also consider the treatment philosophy used at the particular institution and the timing of the radiographic studies used to determine the stone-free status.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 14
页数:3
相关论文
共 27 条
[21]  
SEITZ G, 1991, Journal of Endourology, V5, P17, DOI 10.1089/end.1991.5.17
[22]   EXPERIENCE WITH THE DORNIER HM4 AND MPL-9000 LITHOTRIPTORS IN URINARY STONE TREATMENT [J].
TAILLY, GG .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1990, 144 (03) :622-627
[23]   COMPARATIVE-STUDIES OF EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY BY DORNIER HM3, EDAP LT 01 AND SONOLITH 2000 DEVICES [J].
TAN, EC ;
TUNG, KH ;
FOO, KT .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1991, 146 (02) :294-297
[24]  
Thomas R, 1988, J ENDOUROL, V2, P141, DOI [DOI 10.1089/END.1988.2.141, 10.1089/end.1988.2.141]
[25]   A REPORT ON EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY RESULTS ON 1,569 RENAL UNITS IN AN OUTPATIENT-CLINIC [J].
TOLON, M ;
MIROGLU, C ;
EROL, H ;
TOLON, J ;
ACAR, D ;
BAZMANOGLU, E ;
ERKAN, A ;
AMATO, S .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1991, 145 (04) :695-698
[26]   PIEZOELECTRIC EXTRACORPOREAL LITHOTRIPSY BY ULTRASHORT WAVES WITH THE EDAP LT-01 DEVICE [J].
VALLANCIEN, G ;
AVILES, J ;
MUNOZ, R ;
VEILLON, B ;
CHARTON, M ;
BRISSET, JM .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1988, 139 (04) :689-694
[27]  
WILSON W T, 1990, Journal of Endourology, V4, P407