BARGAINING BEHAVIOR IN A TRANSFER PRICING EXPERIMENT

被引:9
作者
RAVENSCROFT, SP
HAKA, SF
CHALOS, P
机构
[1] MICHIGAN STATE UNIV, DEPT ACCOUNTING, E LANSING, MI 48824 USA
[2] UNIV ILLINOIS, DEPT ACCOUNTING, CHICAGO, IL 60680 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1006/obhd.1993.1038
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of market threat capacity, external incentives, and time horizons on bargaining behavior in a transfer price simulation. Each subject played the role of a divisional manager. Market threat capacity was the option held by one negotiator to sell or buy his or her product in an external market. Incentives were based either entirely on a division′s profit or on both the divisional profits and the firmwide profits. Time horizon was manipulated at two levels-a single round of bargaining or a multiple round setting, the length of which was not specified to the subjects. Uncertainty regarding threat capacity reduced the frequency of cooperative bargaining. Contrary to expectations, subjects paid according to divisional profits cooperated more frequently than subjects paid on a joint basis of division and firm profits. Subjects did not become more cooperative over three rounds of negotiating, but the rate of cooperative behavior was affected by whether subjects expected to negotiate multiple or single rounds with the same person. The results indicate the importance of a multiple negotiation time horizon, threat capacity, and incentives on negotiation behavior. © 1993 Academic Press, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:414 / 443
页数:30
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Ackelsberg R., 1979, Decision Sciences, V10, P387, DOI 10.1111/j.1540-5915.1979.tb00033.x
[2]  
Axelrod R., 1984, EVOLUTION COOPERATIO
[3]  
Bacharach Samuel B., 1981, BARGAINING POWER TAC
[4]   INTEGRATIVE BARGAINING IN A COMPETITIVE MARKET [J].
BAZERMAN, MH ;
MAGLIOZZI, T ;
NEALE, MA .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1985, 35 (03) :294-313
[5]   RESISTANCE TO YIELDING AND THE EXPECTATION OF COOPERATIVE FUTURE INTERACTION IN NEGOTIATION [J].
BENYOAV, O ;
PRUITT, DG .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1984, 20 (04) :323-335
[6]   TYPE-I ERROR RATE OF THE CHI-SQUARE TEST OF INDEPENDENCE IN RXC TABLES THAT HAVE SMALL EXPECTED FREQUENCIES [J].
BRADLEY, DR ;
BRADLEY, TD ;
MCGRATH, SG ;
CUTCOMB, SD .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1979, 86 (06) :1290-1297
[7]   OPPORTUNISM, INCENTIVES, AND THE M-FORM HYPOTHESIS - A LABORATORY STUDY [J].
BURTON, RM ;
OBEL, B .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 1988, 10 (01) :99-119
[8]  
CHALOS P, 1990, ACCOUNT REV, V65, P624
[9]   A LABORATORY INVESTIGATION OF ALTERNATIVE TRANSFER PRICING MECHANISMS [J].
DEJONG, DV ;
FORSYTHE, R ;
KIM, JO ;
UECKER, WC .
ACCOUNTING ORGANIZATIONS AND SOCIETY, 1989, 14 (1-2) :41-64
[10]   THE EFFECT OF THREAT UPON INTERPERSONAL BARGAINING [J].
DEUTSCH, M ;
KRAUSS, RM .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1960, 61 (02) :181-189