GUIDELINES FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF NEW DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS

被引:55
作者
VANDERSCHOUW, YT
VERBEEK, ALM
RUIJS, SHJ
机构
[1] UNIV NIJMEGEN,DEPT MED INFORMAT & EPIDEMIOL,NIJMEGEN,NETHERLANDS
[2] UNIV NIJMEGEN HOSP,DEPT DIAGNOST RADIOL,6500 HB NIJMEGEN,NETHERLANDS
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00004424-199506000-00002
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES. Because new diagnostic tests become available rapidly, the authors determined a need for proper assessment of tests before their implementation in clinical practice, Three factors are of pivotal importance: the selection of the proper study population, the determination of the diagnostic power including its related statistical analysis, and the relation of the new test to current diagnostic tools, Patients suspected of having a disease are those who would benefit from the application of a new test, Therefore, only those patients need be involved in the assessment study. METHODS. Summary measures of diagnostic power other than sensitivity and specificity are advocated because these conventional measures depend on cutoff points and are susceptible to selection bias, The relation between the new test and existing diagnostic tools must be established to determine if the new test contributes to the diagnostic process. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION. TO avoid waste of effort and money, the authors suggest a prudent assessment approach in phases, Whereas the initial challenge consists of selection of an adequate patient population, subsequently all determinants of disease (signs, symptoms, comorbidity, and other diagnostic factors) and factors influencing the decision to use a test (patient burden and cost) are considered,
引用
收藏
页码:334 / 340
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[11]  
KOBBERLING J, 1990, J CLIN CHEM CLIN BIO, V28, P873
[13]   STATISTICAL APPROACHES TO THE ANALYSIS OF RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC (ROC) CURVES [J].
MCNEIL, BJ ;
HANLEY, JA .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 1984, 4 (02) :137-150
[15]  
MIETTINEN OS, 1987, THEORY MED CORE POST
[16]  
Miettinen OS., 1985, PRINCIPLES OCCURRENC
[17]   HOW TO EVALUATE A DIAGNOSTIC MARKER TEST - LESSONS FROM THE RISE AND FALL OF DEXAMETHASONE SUPPRESSION TEST [J].
NIERENBERG, AA ;
FEINSTEIN, AR .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1988, 259 (11) :1699-1702
[18]  
RANSOHOFF DF, 1978, NEW ENGL J MED, V22, P926
[19]   BAYESIAN-ANALYSIS OF ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC EXERCISE STRESS TESTING [J].
RIFKIN, RD ;
HOOD, WB .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1977, 297 (13) :681-686
[20]  
Sackett DL, 1985, CLIN EPIDEMIOLOGY BA