CURRENT STATUS OF DIGITAL PROJECTIONAL RADIOGRAPHY OF THE CHEST

被引：14

作者：

ABERLE, DR

HANSELL, D

HUANG, HK

机构：

[1] Department of Radiological Services, University of California at Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA

[2] Radiology Department, Brompton Hospital, Fulham Road

[3] Medical Imating Division, Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California at Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA

来源：

JOURNAL OF THORACIC IMAGING | 1990年 / 5卷 / 01期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1097/00005382-199001000-00004

中图分类号：

R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];

学科分类号：

1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;

摘要：

Thoracic imaging constitutes more than one-third of all medical imaging performed in the United States. Despite the substantial impact of computer technology in other areas of imaging, conventional film-screen acquisition systems still provide the bulk of projectional chest radiography. The successful implementation of digital technology in thoracic imaging requires that the standards of current film-screen methods for both diagnostic accuracy and efficient data management be preserved. This article addresses the technical and clinical aspects of film digitization and storage phosphor technology, which are the two digital acquisition systems in widest application. Scanned projection radiography, which may now be applied to computed radiography systems, is also discussed. Finally, some of the issues surrounding the implementation of picture archiving and communication systems for thoracic imaging are addressed. © 1990 Aspen Publishers, Inc.

引用

页码：10 / 20

页数：11

共 60 条

[11]

Metz C.E., ROC methodology in radiologic imaging, Invest Radiol., 21, pp. 720-733, (1986)

[12]

Seeley G.W., Fisher H.D., Stempski M.O., Borgstrom M., Bjelland J., Capp M.P., Total digital radiology department: Spatial resolution requirements, AJR., 148, pp. 421-426, (1987)

[13]

MacMahon H., Vyborny C.J., Metz C.E., Doi K., Sabeti V., Solomon S.L., Digital radiography of subtle pulmonary abnormalities: An ROC study of the effect of pixel size on observer performance, Radiology, 158, pp. 21-26, (1986)

[14]

Goodman L.R., Foley W.D., Wilson C.R., Rimm A.A., Lawson T.L., Digital and conventional chest images: Observer performance with film digital radiography system, Radiology, 158, pp. 27-33, (1986)

[15]

Foley W.D., Wilson C.R., Keyes G.S., Et al., The effect of varying spatial resolution on the detectability of diffuse pulmonary nodules, Radiology, 141, pp. 25-31, (1981)

[16]

Lams P.M., Cocklin M.L., Spatial resolution requirements for digital chest radiographs: An ROC study of observer performance in selected cases, Radiology, 158, pp. 11-19, (1986)

[17]

Goodman L.R., Foley W.D., Wilson C.R., Tikofsky R.S., Hoffman R.G., Pneumothorax and other lung diseases: Effect of altered resolution and edge enhancement on diagnosis with digitized radiographs, Radiology, 167, pp. 83-88, (1988)

[18]

MacMahon H., Metz C.E., Doi K., Kim T., Giger M.L., Chan H.-P., Digital chest radiography: Effect on diagnostic accuracy of hard copy, conventional video, and reversed gray scale video display formats, Radiology, 168, pp. 669-673, (1988)

[19]

Frost M., Staab E.V., Displays: Contrast and spatial requirements, Invest Radiol., 24, pp. 95-98, (1989)

[20]

Hayrapetian A., Aberle D.R., Huang H.K., Et al., Comparison of 2048-line digital display formats and conventional radiographs: An ROC study, AJR., 152, pp. 1113-1118, (1989)

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 →