CARAMIPHEN, IODOCARAMIPHEN AND NITROCARAMIPHEN ARE POTENT, COMPETITIVE, MUSCARINIC-M1 RECEPTOR-SELECTIVE AGENTS

被引:34
作者
HUDKINS, RL
STUBBINS, JF
DEHAVENHUDKINS, DL
机构
[1] STERLING WINTHROP PHARMACEUT RES DIV,DEPT ENZYMOL & RECEPTOR BIOCHEM,25 GREAT VALLEY PKWY,MALVERN,PA 19355
[2] VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIV,MED COLL VIRGINIA,SCH PHARM,DEPT MED CHEM,RICHMOND,VA 23298
关键词
CARAMIPHEN; IODOCARAMIPHEN; NITROCARAMIPHEN; MUSCARINIC RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS; MUSCARINIC-M1; RECEPTORS; (RAT);
D O I
10.1016/0014-2999(93)90130-A
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Caramiphen, iodocaramiphen and nitrocaramiphen were examined for affinity at the muscarinic M1, M2 and M3 receptor subtypes in radioligand binding assays. Caramiphen binds with high affinity at the M1 site labeled by [H-3]pirenzepine in rat cortex (K(i) = 1.2 nM) and displays a 27-fold greater preference for the M1 than the M2 site labeled by [H-3](-)-quinuclidinyl benzilate in rat heart, and a 6-fold greater preference for the M1 than the M3 site labeled by [H-3]N-methylscopolamine in rat submaxillary gland. Iodocaramiphen binds with high affinity (K(i) = 2.1 nM) and selectivity (59-fold) for the M1 vs. M2 subtype, and is 4-fold more selective for the M1 vs. M3 Site. Nitrocaramiphen binds with high affinity for M1 sites (K(i) = 5.5 nM) and with a 71-fold selectivity over M2, and a 10-fold selectivity for the M1 over the M3 subtype. All three compounds interacted with the M1 binding site in a competitive manner. Nitrocaramiphen and iodocaramiphen are as potent and showed a comparable selectivity for binding to the M1 over the M2 site than the prototypical agent pirenzepine (M1; K(i) = 5.2 nM, 51-fold selectivity). Additionally, nitrocaramiphen demonstrates at least a 10-fold selectivity for the M1 over the M3 site. These ester-type antimuscarinics may be better ligands for the study of M1 receptors in brain than the hydrophilic agent pirenzepine.
引用
收藏
页码:485 / 488
页数:4
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]   LOSS OF PIRENZEPINE REGIONAL SELECTIVITY FOLLOWING SOLUBILIZATION AND PARTIAL-PURIFICATION OF THE PUTATIVE M1 AND M2 MUSCARINIC RECEPTOR SUBTYPES [J].
BAUMGOLD, J ;
MERRIL, C ;
GERSHON, ES .
MOLECULAR BRAIN RESEARCH, 1987, 2 (01) :7-14
[2]  
BROWN JH, 1985, MOL PHARMACOL, V27, P525
[3]   MUSCARINIC RECEPTOR-BINDING PROFILE OF PARA-SUBSTITUTED CARAMIPHEN ANALOGS [J].
HUDKINS, RL ;
DEHAVENHUDKINS, DL ;
STUBBINS, JF .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY, 1991, 34 (10) :2984-2989
[4]   MUSCARINIC RECEPTOR SUBTYPES [J].
HULME, EC ;
BIRDSALL, NJM ;
BUCKLEY, NJ .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PHARMACOLOGY AND TOXICOLOGY, 1990, 30 :633-673
[5]   TREATMENT OF POISONING BY SOMAN [J].
LEADBEATER, L ;
INNS, RH ;
RYLANDS, JM .
FUNDAMENTAL AND APPLIED TOXICOLOGY, 1985, 5 (06) :S225-S231
[6]  
LEVINE RR, 1989, TRENDS PHARM SCI S, V10, pR7
[7]   ANALYSIS OF RADIOLIGAND BINDING EXPERIMENTS - A COLLECTION OF COMPUTER-PROGRAMS FOR THE IBM-PC [J].
MCPHERSON, GA .
JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGICAL METHODS, 1985, 14 (03) :213-228
[8]   MUSCARINIC RECEPTOR DIFFERENTIATION [J].
MITCHELSON, F .
PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1988, 37 (03) :357-423
[9]  
WITKIN JM, 1987, J PHARMACOL EXP THER, V242, P796