AUTOMATED PEAK DETECTION AND CELL-CYCLE ANALYSIS OF FLOW CYTOMETRIC DNA HISTOGRAMS

被引:29
作者
KALLIONIEMI, OP
VISAKORPI, T
HOLLI, K
ISOLA, JJ
RABINOVITCH, PS
机构
[1] UNIV WASHINGTON,DEPT PATHOL,SM-30,SEATTLE,WA 98195
[2] TAMPERE UNIV HOSP,DEPT CLIN CHEM,CANC GENET LAB,TAMPERE,FINLAND
[3] TAMPERE UNIV HOSP,DEPT RADIOTHERAPY & ONCOL,TAMPERE,FINLAND
[4] UNIV TAMPERE,DEPT BIOMED SCI,SF-33101 TAMPERE,FINLAND
来源
CYTOMETRY | 1994年 / 16卷 / 03期
关键词
ANEUPLOIDY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; PROGNOSIS; CELL CYCLE ANALYSIS; S PHASE; TUMOR PROLIFERATION;
D O I
10.1002/cyto.990160309
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
We describe an algorithm for fully automated flow cytometric DNA histogram classification and analysis that provides rapid, reproducible determination of DNA index and S-phase fraction (SPF). Automated classification agreed with subjective assessment of DNA ploidy in 96-98% of DNA histograms. Automated and conventional analyses of DNA index (r = 0.95) and SPF (r = 0.89) were also highly correlated with one another. In a series of 86 node-negative breast carcinomas, SPF calculated with the fully automated method was a significant predictor of 10 year survival (p = 0.009). Automation greatly increased the speed of DNA histogram analysis, allowing evaluation of the same set of histograms with different methods. In a preliminary study exploring the optimization of DNA histogram analysis, the best association between SPF and prognosis of breast cancer patients was achieved using sliced nuclei debris modeling, reporting only the aneuploid SPF (in aneuploid histograms), while excluding small aneuploid clones (<15% of total cell count) from evaluation. In conclusion, automated DNA histogram analysis does not replace the need for close human supervision but provides a useful guideline for less experienced users, facilitates interlaboratory comparisons, and makes possible extensive reanalyses of large data sets. (C) 1994 Wiley-Liss,Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:250 / 255
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   DNA HISTOGRAM DEBRIS THEORY AND COMPENSATION [J].
BAGWELL, CB ;
MAYO, SW ;
WHETSTONE, SD ;
HITCHCOX, SA ;
BAKER, DR ;
HERBERT, DJ ;
WEAVER, DL ;
JONES, MA ;
LOVETT, EJ .
CYTOMETRY, 1991, 12 (02) :107-118
[2]  
BEVINGTON PR, 1969, DATA REDUCTION ERROR, P153
[3]  
COON JS, 1988, CANCER, V61, P126, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19880101)61:1<126::AID-CNCR2820610122>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-5
[5]   MATHEMATICAL-ANALYSIS OF DNA DISTRIBUTIONS DERIVED FROM FLOW MICROFLUOROMETRY [J].
DEAN, PN ;
JETT, JH .
JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY, 1974, 60 (02) :523-527
[6]   A SIMPLIFIED METHOD OF DNA DISTRIBUTION ANALYSIS [J].
DEAN, PN .
CELL AND TISSUE KINETICS, 1980, 13 (03) :299-308
[7]  
HITCHCOCK CL, 1991, CYTOMETRY S, V5, P46
[8]   DIFFERENT OPINIONS ON CLASSIFICATION OF DNA HISTOGRAMS PRODUCED FROM PARAFFIN-EMBEDDED TISSUE [J].
JOENSUU, H ;
KALLIONIEMI, OP .
CYTOMETRY, 1989, 10 (06) :711-717
[9]   INTER-LABORATORY COMPARISON OF DNA FLOW CYTOMETRIC RESULTS FROM PARAFFIN-EMBEDDED BREAST CARCINOMAS [J].
KALLIONIEMI, OP ;
JOENSUU, H ;
KLEMI, P ;
KOIVULA, T .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 1990, 17 (01) :59-61
[10]   IMPROVED PROGNOSTIC IMPACT OF S-PHASE VALUES FROM PARAFFIN-EMBEDDED BREAST AND PROSTATE CARCINOMAS AFTER CORRECTING FOR NUCLEAR SLICING [J].
KALLIONIEMI, OP ;
VISAKORPI, T ;
HOLLI, K ;
HEIKKINEN, A ;
ISOLA, J ;
KOIVULA, T .
CYTOMETRY, 1991, 12 (05) :413-421