COMPARISON OF RAT AND CHICK LIMB BUD MICROMASS CULTURES FOR DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICITY SCREENING

被引:17
作者
BROWN, NA [1 ]
WIGER, R [1 ]
机构
[1] NATL INST PUBL HLTH,DEPT ENVIRONM MED,N-0462 OSLO 4,NORWAY
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0887-2333(92)90002-9
中图分类号
R99 [毒物学(毒理学)];
学科分类号
100405 ;
摘要
This study compares the responses of rat and chick limb bud micromass cultures to chemical treatment. Eight chemicals, of diverse structure, potency and mechanism, were tested, using two endpoints: extractable alcian blue stain as a measure of differentiation to chondrocytes, and extractable neutral red stain as an index of proliferation. Each chemical reduced differentiation and proliferation in a concentration-related manner. IC50s, concentrations that reduced staining by 50%, ranged from 10 nM (colchicine) to 4 mM (acetazolamide). Rat and chick responses to acetazolamide, colchicine and diazepam were indistinguishable. For diphenhydramine and sulphisoxazole, concentration-response curves Were very similar, but rat IC50s were half that of chick. For two chemicals, concentration-response slopes were markedly steeper for chick; in the case of beta-aminopropionitrile, IC50s were similar, but rat cultures were three-fold more sensitive than chick to cytosine arabinoside. 6-Aminonicotinamide gave a U-shaped response curve, for both endpoints and both species, so IC50s may be misleading, but the IC50 for proliferation was lower for chick (0.6-mu-M) than rat (4-mu-M). In vivo and in vitro parameters for validation of developmental toxicity screens are contentious. Diphenhydramine apart, these chemicals can be teratogenic in vivo, although their 'hazard' can be debated. An IC50-proliferation/IC50-differentiation ratio > 2 has been suggested to predict specific developmental toxicity. Only sulphisoxazole and 6-aminonicotinamide had significantly different IC50s for proliferation and differentiation, with ratios of 4.4 (both species), and 10.4 for rat and 1.9 for chick, respectively. All other ratios were close to 1. The general consistency of this ratio, and the concentration-responses, in the two species suggests that the chick is a viable alternative to laboratory mammals, but the predictive ability of micromass remains to be determined.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 107
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[21]   EVALUATION OF 2 INVITRO ASSAYS TO SCREEN FOR POTENTIAL DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICANTS [J].
STEELE, VE ;
MORRISSEY, RE ;
ELMORE, EL ;
GURGANUSROCHA, D ;
WILKINSON, BP ;
CURREN, RD ;
SCHMETTER, BS ;
LOUIE, AT ;
LAMB, JC ;
YANG, LL .
FUNDAMENTAL AND APPLIED TOXICOLOGY, 1988, 11 (04) :673-684
[22]   ESTIMATING CHEMICAL DEVELOPMENTAL HAZARD IN A CHICKEN-EMBRYO LIMB BUD MICROMASS SYSTEM [J].
WIGER, R ;
STOTTUM, A ;
BRUNBORG, G .
PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 1988, 62 (01) :32-37
[23]   EXAMINATION OF A RODENT LIMB BUD MICROMASS ASSAY AS A PRESCREEN FOR DEVELOPMENT TOXICITY [J].
WISE, LD ;
CLARK, RL ;
RUNDELL, JO ;
ROBERTSON, RT .
TERATOLOGY, 1990, 41 (03) :341-351
[24]  
[No title captured]