FACTORS RELATED TO THE INCIDENCE OF RUNNING INJURIES - A REVIEW

被引:60
作者
HOEBERIGS, JH
机构
[1] Instituut Sportgeneeskunde Limburg, University of Limburg, Maastricht, 6200 MD
关键词
D O I
10.2165/00007256-199213060-00004
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
The term incidence is interpreted in many different ways in the literature. Running injury epidemiology should include denominator-based incidence rates, in which the number of new injuries observed during 1 year is related to the population of runners at risk. In 10 studies with denominator-based incidences selected from the literature, the annual incidence rates of injured runners vary from 24 to 65%. Comparison of denominator-based incidence rates from different studies requires a discussion of the denominator and of the numerator; i.e. the study population and the definition of running injury. Injury definitions differ from one study to another. Study populations are particular subgroups of the total running population and they differ from one study to another. Subgroups may differ in origin: volunteers, runners from a mailing list or entrants of a road race. Incidence rates are higher among supervised volunteers than among listed runners, and higher among both these groups than among race-entrants.' The choice from the universe of the running population and the used injury definition are methodological issues. Incidence is dependently associated with the prevalence of predisposing running injury factors. There is consistent epidemiological support for the role of a few aetiological factors; i.e. higher mileage per week, previous running injury, higher running speed and lesser running experience. Higher mileage per week is probably the strongest predictor. In the selected injury studies, mileage per week differs from one study population to another. Differences in mileage per week do not explain differences in incidence rate between these studies. In conclusion, caution must be taken when comparing annual incidence rates of different studies. Methodological issues are at least as important as aetiological factors. Study populations may refer to different selections of the universe of the running population. The lengths of observation periods and 'running injury' definitions may differ from one study to another.
引用
收藏
页码:408 / 422
页数:15
相关论文
共 64 条
[21]  
Hoeberigs J.H., van Galen W.C.C., Philipsen H., Denominator based injury incidences in 15 sports. Abstract, Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 22, (1990)
[22]  
Holmich P., Darre E., Jahnsen F., Hartvig-Jensen T., The elite marathon runner: problems during and after competition, British Journal of Sports Medicine, 22, pp. 19-21, (1988)
[23]  
Holmich P., Christensen S.W., Darre E., Jahnsen F., Hartvig T., Nonelite marathon runners: health, training and injuries, British Journal of Sports Medicine, 23, pp. 177-178, (1989)
[24]  
Hutson M.A., Medical implications of ultra marathon running: observations on a six day track race, British Journal of Sports Medicine, 18, pp. 44-45, (1984)
[25]  
Jacobs S.J., Berson B.L., Injuries to runners: a study of entrants to a 10 000 meter race, American Journal of Sports Medicine, 14, pp. 151-155, (1986)
[26]  
James S.L., Bates B.T., Osternig L.R., Injuries to runners, American Journal of Sports Medicine, 6, pp. 40-45, (1978)
[27]  
Janssen G.M.E., Marathon running: functional changes in male and female volunteers during training and contests, (1988)
[28]  
Konradsen L., Berg-Hansen E., Sondergaard L., Long distance running and osteoarthrosis, American Journal of Sports Medicine, 18, pp. 379-381, (1990)
[29]  
Koplan J.P., Powell K.E., Sikes R.K., Shirley R.W., Campbell C.C., An epidemiologic study of the benefits and risks of running, Journal of the American Medical Association, 248, pp. 3118-3121, (1982)
[30]  
Koplan J.P., Siscovick D.S., Goldbaum G., The risk of exercise: a public health view of injuries and hazards, Public Health Report, 100, pp. 189-195, (1985)