FAILURE OF FOCAL PROSTATE-CANCER ON BIOPSY TO PREDICT FOCAL PROSTATE-CANCER - THE IMPORTANCE OF PREVALENCE

被引:43
作者
WELDON, VE
TAVEL, FR
NEUWIRTH, H
COHEN, R
机构
[1] MARIN GEN HOSP, DIV UROL, SAN RAFAEL, CA USA
[2] MARIN GEN HOSP, DIV PATHOL, SAN RAFAEL, CA USA
关键词
PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA; BIOPSY; NEOPLASM STAGING;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-5347(01)66980-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We investigated whether the reported correlation between focal prostate cancer on biopsy and the presence of clinically insignificant cancer applies to men with an elevated serum prostate specific antigen level or a positive biopsy from an area of palpable abnormality. Materials and Methods: A total of 33 men with these findings and focal cancer on biopsy underwent radical perineal prostatectomy, with step-section pathological analysis of all specimens and volume determination of all stage pT2a tumors. Results: Pathological examination revealed that 17 tumors (52%) were stage T3, 10 (30%) stage T2b to c and 6 (18%) stage T2a, with 4 (12%) significant (volumes 0.8 to 1.2 mi.) and 2 (6%) insignificant (volumes 0.1 and 0.3 mi.) neoplasms. Thus, focal prostate cancer on biopsy correlated with significant cancer in 94% of the cases. Conclusions: In patients with another variable controlling for a high prevalence of significant prostate cancer, the focal nature of a positive biopsy probably refects only sampling limitations and should not influence treatment. To restrict prostate biopsy to men with a high prevalence of significant cancer, targeted area biopsy alone must replace sextant biopsy in men with a palpable prostatic abnormality but a normal prostate specific antigen level.
引用
收藏
页码:1074 / 1077
页数:4
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Altman D, 1991, PRACTICAL STAT MED R, P409
[2]  
ANDRIOLE G L, 1992, Journal of Urology, V147, p442A
[3]   PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN DENSITY - A MEANS OF DISTINGUISHING BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERTROPHY AND PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
BENSON, MC ;
WHANG, IS ;
PANTUCK, A ;
RING, K ;
KAPLAN, SA ;
OLSSON, CA ;
COONER, WH .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1992, 147 (03) :815-816
[4]   PATHOLOGICAL AND CLINICAL FINDINGS TO PREDICT TUMOR EXTENT OF NONPALPABLE (STAGE-T1C) PROSTATE-CANCER [J].
EPSTEIN, JI ;
WALSH, PC ;
CARMICHAEL, M ;
BRENDLER, CB .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1994, 271 (05) :368-374
[5]   LATENT CARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE [J].
FRANKS, LM .
JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY AND BACTERIOLOGY, 1954, 68 (02) :603-&
[6]   PREDICTION OF PROGNOSIS FOR PROSTATIC ADENOCARCINOMA BY COMBINED HISTOLOGICAL GRADING AND CLINICAL STAGING [J].
GLEASON, DF ;
MELLINGE.GT .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1974, 111 (01) :58-64
[7]  
Goto Yasuki, 1994, Journal of Urology, V151, p289A
[8]   IDENTIFICATION OF INSIGNIFICANT PROSTATE CANCERS - ANALYSIS OF PREOPERATIVE PARAMETERS [J].
IRWIN, MB ;
TRAPASSO, JG .
UROLOGY, 1994, 44 (06) :862-867
[9]   THE BENEFIT AND COST OF PROSTATE-CANCER EARLY DETECTION [J].
LITTRUP, PJ ;
GOODMAN, AC ;
METTLIN, CJ .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 1993, 43 (03) :134-149
[10]  
SCHMID HP, 1993, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V71, P2031, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19930315)71:6<2031::AID-CNCR2820710618>3.0.CO