COMPARISON OF ARTIFACT FROM CRANIOMAXILLOFACIAL INTERNAL-FIXATION DEVICES - MAGNETIC-RESONANCE-IMAGING

被引:45
作者
FIALA, TGS
PAIGE, KT
DAVIS, TL
CAMPBELL, TA
ROSEN, BR
YAREMCHUK, MJ
机构
[1] MASSACHUSETTS GEN HOSP,WANG AMBULATORY CARE CTR,DEPT SURG,DIV PLAST SURG,BOSTON,MA 02114
[2] MASSACHUSETTS GEN HOSP,DEPT RADIOL,BOSTON,MA 02114
[3] HARVARD UNIV,MIT,DIV HLTH SCI & TECHNOL,BOSTON,MA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00006534-199404000-00011
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
This study compares artifact from craniomaxillofacial internal fixation devices in magnetic resonance images and examines heating and magnetic deflection effects on these devices. Stainless steel wires, microfixation plates of vitallium and titanium, and minifixation and mandibular reconstruction plates of stainless steel, vitallium, and titanium were evaluated. The plates were mounted on a dry skull and submerged in dilute copper sulfate solution. All images were obtained in duplicate by two independent, nonblinded teams of observers with a 1.5-T Signa magnetic resonance system. Each team ranked artifact size for each material by computerized measurement. The rank order of artifact size for each material within each fixation system group and between fixation groups was identical between the two teams. Bath and plate temperatures were recorded before and after imaging. Artifact production was related to hardware size and composition. Titanium hardware caused the least amount of ''blackhole'' artifact. Vitallium and stainless steel fixation devices of similar size produced significantly more artifact. No significant heating or magnetic deflection effects were seen with any of the fixation devices.
引用
收藏
页码:725 / 731
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   MR ARTIFACTS - A REVIEW [J].
BELLON, EM ;
HAACKE, EM ;
COLEMAN, PE ;
SACCO, DC ;
STEIGER, DA ;
GANGAROSA, RE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1986, 147 (06) :1271-1281
[2]   HEATING EFFECTS OF METALLIC IMPLANTS BY MRI EXAMINATIONS [J].
BUCHLI, R ;
BOESIGER, P ;
MEIER, D .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 1988, 7 (03) :255-261
[3]   POTENTIAL HAZARDS IN NMR IMAGING - HEATING EFFECTS OF CHANGING MAGNETIC-FIELDS AND RF FIELDS ON SMALL METALLIC IMPLANTS [J].
DAVIS, PL ;
CROOKS, L ;
ARAKAWA, M ;
MCREE, R ;
KAUFMAN, L ;
MARGULIS, AR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1981, 137 (04) :857-860
[4]   IMPORTANT CONSIDERATIONS IN MEASUREMENT OF ATTRACTIVE FORCE ON METALLIC IMPLANTS IN MR IMAGERS [J].
KAGETSU, NJ ;
LITT, AW .
RADIOLOGY, 1991, 179 (02) :505-508
[5]   SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS IN MR IMAGING [J].
KANAL, E ;
SHELLOCK, FG ;
TALAGALA, L .
RADIOLOGY, 1990, 176 (03) :593-606
[6]   MR IMAGING IN PATIENTS WITH METALLIC IMPLANTS [J].
LAAKMAN, RW ;
KAUFMAN, B ;
HAN, JS ;
NELSON, AD ;
CLAMPITT, M ;
OBLOCK, AM ;
HAAGA, JR ;
ALFIDI, RJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1985, 157 (03) :711-714
[7]  
Ludeke K M, 1985, Magn Reson Imaging, V3, P329, DOI 10.1016/0730-725X(85)90397-2
[8]   THE EFFECT OF MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGING ON METAL SPINE IMPLANTS [J].
LYONS, CJ ;
BETZ, RR ;
MESGARZADEH, M ;
REVESZ, G ;
BONAKDARPOUR, A ;
CLANCY, M .
SPINE, 1989, 14 (07) :670-672
[9]   TANTALUM VASCULAR STENTS - INVIVO EVALUATION WITH MR IMAGING [J].
MATSUMOTO, AH ;
TEITELBAUM, GP ;
BARTH, KH ;
CARVLIN, MJ ;
SAVIN, MA ;
STRECKER, EP .
RADIOLOGY, 1989, 170 (03) :753-755
[10]  
MATWIYOFF N, 1990, MAGNETIC RESONANCE W, P120