CONCEPT OF MAXIMUM TOLERATED SYSTEMIC EXPOSURE AND ITS APPLICATION TO PHASE-I-II STUDIES OF ANTICANCER DRUGS

被引:32
作者
EVANS, WE
RODMAN, JH
RELLING, MV
CROM, WR
RIVERA, GK
PRATT, CB
CRIST, WM
机构
[1] UNIV TENNESSEE, CTR HLTH SCI, DEPT PEDIAT, MEMPHIS, TN 38163 USA
[2] UNIV TENNESSEE, CTR HLTH SCI, DEPT CLIN PHARM, MEMPHIS, TN 38163 USA
[3] UNIV TENNESSEE, CTR HLTH SCI, CTR PEDIAT PHARMACOKINET & THERAPEUT, MEMPHIS, TN 38163 USA
[4] ST JUDE CHILDRENS RES HOSP, DEPT HEMATOL ONCOL, MEMPHIS, TN 38101 USA
来源
MEDICAL AND PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY | 1991年 / 19卷 / 03期
关键词
DOSAGE ESCALATION; PHARMACODYNAMICS; MTD; MTSE;
D O I
10.1002/mpo.2950190302
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The traditional approach to conducting Phase I studies of anticancer drugs is to select a starting dosage for humans based on preclinical data (e.g., mg equivalent of 1/10 LD10 in mice), then empirically escalate dosages in cohorts of patients until the maximum tolerated dosage (MTD) is established. More recently, NCI and EORTC investigators have advocated the use of pharmacokinetic data from preclinical studies to facilitate more rapid dose escalation (e.g., double the dose until the area under the concentration-time curve [AUC] in humans equals the AUC in mice at the LD10). The present paper describes a strategy which builds on the above approach, by extending the application of pharmacokinetic principles to systematically escalate systemic exposure (AUC) instead of dosage in Phase I trials. Human trials are initiated at whatever patient-specific dosage is required to achieve an AUC equal to 1/10 the AUC in mice at the LD10, such that three patients at the first treatment level might receive three different dosage. If no dose-limiting toxicity is observed, the next cohort of patients receives whatever dosage is required to achieve 2x AUC of the first dosage level, with AUC escalation continuing until the maximum tolerate systemic exposure (MTSE) is reached. By escalating systemic exposure instead of dosage, one adjusts for interpatient pharmacokinetic variability. This strategy will permit more rapid and precise dosage escalations and, more importantly, it should more precisely establish the maximum level of treatment intensity for future Phase II trials.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 159
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[11]   CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS-PHARMACODYNAMICS OF ANTICANCER DRUGS [J].
EVANS, WE ;
RELLING, MV .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 1989, 16 (06) :327-336
[12]  
GRIESHABER CK, 1986, CANCER TREAT REP, V70, P65
[13]  
MARSONI S, 1985, CANCER TREAT REP, V69, P1263
[14]   THERAPEUTIC DRUG-MONITORING IN ONCOLOGY - PROBLEMS AND POTENTIAL IN ANTINEOPLASTIC THERAPY [J].
MOORE, MJ ;
ERLICHMAN, C .
CLINICAL PHARMACOKINETICS, 1987, 13 (04) :205-227
[15]  
PETROS WP, IN PRESS CANCER CHEM
[16]  
RELLING M V, 1990, FASEB Journal, V4, pA739
[17]  
RODMAN J, 1989, CLIN PHARMACOL THER, V45, P132
[18]   CLINICAL PHARMACODYNAMICS OF CONTINUOUS INFUSION TENIPOSIDE - SYSTEMIC EXPOSURE AS A DETERMINANT OF RESPONSE IN A PHASE-I TRIAL [J].
RODMAN, JH ;
ABROMOWITCH, M ;
SINKULE, JA ;
HAYES, FA ;
RIVERA, GK ;
EVANS, WE .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1987, 5 (07) :1007-1014
[19]  
RODMAN JH, 1990, CANCER RES, V50, P4267
[20]  
1987, EUR J CANCER CLIN ON, V23, P1083