A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND PILOT-STUDY EXAMINING THE USE OF INTRAVENOUS ONDANSETRON IN THE PREVENTION OF POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING IN FEMALE INPATIENTS

被引:36
作者
MCKENZIE, R
SHARIFIAZAD, S
DERSHWITZ, M
MIGUEL, R
JOSLYN, AF
TANTISIRA, B
ROSENBLUM, F
ROSOW, CE
DOWNS, JB
BOWIE, JR
SHEAHAN, K
ODELL, S
LESSIN, J
DIBIASE, PM
NATIONS, M
机构
[1] Departments of Anesthesiology, University of Pittsburgh, Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA
[2] Department of Anesthesiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
[3] Department of Anaesthesia, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
[4] Department of Anesthesia, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
[5] Departments of Anesthesiology, University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa, FL
[6] Department of Anesthesiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Research Institute, Tampa, FL
[7] Glaxo, Inc., Research Institute, Research Triangle Park, NC
关键词
NAUSEA AND VOMITING; POSTOPERATIVE; ONDANSETRON; SEROTONIN; 5-HT3;
D O I
10.1016/0952-8180(93)90084-R
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Study Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety profiles of intravenous (IV) ondansetron (two 8 mg doses 8 hours apart) and a placebo when used in the prevention of postoperative nausea and emesis (vomiting or retching). Design: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel, multicenter pilot study. Setting: Four university hospitals in the United States. Patients: Two hundred seven women scheduled to undergo inpatient surgical procedures during general anesthesia. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive, in a double-blind fashion, either two 8 mg doses of IV ondansetron or a placebo. The first study drug dose was administered before induction of anesthesia; the second dose was given 8 hours later. Each study drug dose was admixed with normal saline to 20 ml and administered IV over 2 to 5 minutes. Vital signs were monitored immediately before and 1 minute after completion of the study drug infusion. Measurements and Main Results: For the 24-hour period following operation, 60% of the patients who received ondansetron and 26% of the patients who received the placebo were emesis-free (p < 0.001). Subanalyses based on patients' previous history of general anesthesia indicated that ondansetron was superior to the placebo in preventing emesis regardless of history [66% vs. 33% in patients who had never had general anesthesia or had had no nausea or emesis following previous anesthesia (p = 0.001) and 50% vs. 17% in patients who had nausea or emesis following previous anesthesia (p = 0.005)]. Ondansetron also was superior to the placebo for the prevention Of nausea over the 24-hour study period regardless of anesthesia history. Ondansetron was generally well tolerated. The adverse event, vital sign, and clinical laboratory test profiles were similar to those for the placebo. No patient who received ondansetron had untoward changes in central nervous system function, including sedation. Conclusions: Prophylactic IV ondansetron appears to be safe and causes a significant reduction in the frequency and severity of postoperative nausea and emesis.
引用
收藏
页码:30 / 36
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
[21]  
Winning, Brock-Utne, Downing, Nausea and vomiting after anesthesia and minor surgery, Anesth Analg, 56, pp. 674-677, (1977)
[22]  
Tornetta, A comparison of droperidol, diazepam and hydroxyzine hydrochloride as premedication, Anesth Analg, 56, pp. 496-500, (1977)
[23]  
Hesketh, Twaddell, Finn, A possible role for cisplatin in transient hepatic enzyme elevations noted after ondansetron administration, Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol, 6, (1990)