THE INFLUENCE OF PARAFOVEAL PREPROCESSING AND LINGUISTIC CONTEXT ON THE OPTIMAL LANDING POSITION EFFECT

被引:65
作者
VITU, F
机构
[1] Groupe Regard, Laboratoire de Psychologie Expérimentale, CNRS, Université René Descartes, EPHE, EHESS, Paris, 75006
来源
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS | 1991年 / 50卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.3758/BF03212205
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Several experiments have shown the existence of an optimal landing position effect during isolated word recognition as well as during text reading; both the probability of refixating the test word and the gaze duration are smaller if the eye first fixates near the center of the word than if the eye first fixates other positions in the word. However, recent data indicate that the optimal landing position effect is weakened under normal reading conditions, when words are included in texts. The purpose of the present experiment was to test whether parafoveal preprocessing or linguistic context specific to the text reading situation could be responsible for this weakening. With a paradigm that approximates normal reading, albeit in a somewhat slower manner, it was shown that although the possibility of preprocessing words in parafoveal vision and of prediciting them from preceding context globally affected refixation probability and gaze duration on the word, this did not strongly affect the optimal landing position effect. Since the global effects of these factors were comparable to those found by other authors in normal reading, it was concluded that the weakening of the optimal landing position effect during text reading results from the influence of other factors peculiar to this situation. Hypotheses are proposed as explanations of the effects of the manipulated factors on oculomotor behavior.
引用
收藏
页码:58 / 75
页数:18
相关论文
共 39 条
[21]  
OREGAN JK, 1987, ATTENTION PERFORM, V12, P363
[22]   PARAFOVEAL INFORMATION IS NOT SUFFICIENT TO PRODUCE SEMANTIC OR VISUAL PRIMING [J].
PAAP, KR ;
NEWSOME, SL .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1981, 29 (05) :457-466
[23]   AN ACTIVATION VERIFICATION MODEL FOR LETTER AND WORD RECOGNITION - THE WORD-SUPERIORITY EFFECT [J].
PAAP, KR ;
NEWSOME, SL ;
MCDONALD, JE ;
SCHVANEVELDT, RW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1982, 89 (05) :573-594
[24]   EYE-MOVEMENTS AND INTEGRATING INFORMATION ACROSS FIXATIONS [J].
RAYNER, K ;
MCCONKIE, GW ;
EHRLICH, S .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1978, 4 (04) :529-544
[25]   INTEGRATING INFORMATION ACROSS EYE-MOVEMENTS [J].
RAYNER, K ;
MCCONKIE, GW ;
ZOLA, D .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1980, 12 (02) :206-226
[26]   LEXICAL COMPLEXITY AND FIXATION TIMES IN READING - EFFECTS OF WORD-FREQUENCY, VERB COMPLEXITY, AND LEXICAL AMBIGUITY [J].
RAYNER, K ;
DUFFY, SA .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 1986, 14 (03) :191-201
[27]  
Rayner K., 1978, ATTENTION PERFORM, P149
[28]   SACCADE LATENCY AND WARNING SIGNALS - STIMULUS ONSET, OFFSET, AND CHANGE AS WARNING EVENTS [J].
ROSS, LE ;
ROSS, SM .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1980, 27 (03) :251-257
[29]   EFFECTS OF CONTEXT ON CLASSIFICATION OF WORDS AND NONWORDS [J].
SCHUBERTH, RE ;
EIMAS, PD .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1977, 3 (01) :27-36
[30]   THE INFLUENCE OF SENTENCE CONSTRAINT ON THE SCOPE OF FACILITATION FOR UPCOMING WORDS [J].
SCHWANENFLUGEL, PJ ;
SHOBEN, EJ .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1985, 24 (02) :232-252