MOLECULAR-DYNAMICS AND STATIC SOLVATION STUDIES OF AMILORIDE

被引:16
作者
BUONO, RA
VENANZI, TJ
ZAUHAR, RJ
LUZHKOV, VB
VENANZI, CA
机构
[1] NEW JERSEY INST TECHNOL,DEPT CHEM ENGN CHEM & ENVIRONM SCI,NEWARK,NJ 07102
[2] COLL NEW ROCHELLE,DEPT CHEM,NEW ROCHELLE,NY 10805
[3] PENN STATE UNIV,INST BIOTECHNOL,UNIV PK,PA 16802
[4] PENN STATE UNIV,DEPT MOLEC & CELL BIOL,WARTIK LAB 519,UNIV PK,PA 16802
[5] CHERNOGOLOVKA CHEM PHYS INST,CHERNOGOLOVKA 142432,RUSSIA
关键词
D O I
10.1021/ja00083a039
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
The GROMOS molecular mechanics and dynamics force field was extended and modified in order to investigate the static and dynamic conformational properties of amiloride conformers in solution. Torsional potential functions, Lennard-Jones parameters, and atomic point charges were derived for the free base and protonated species of amiloride. The effect of solvent on the conformation, energy, and intramolecular hydrogen bonding patterns of the free base (A1 and A4) and protonated (F1) species of amiloride was examined by 25-ps simulations of each species in a bath of SPC water molecules. The large torsional barriers for A1 to A4 and F1 to F4 conversion, determined from 3-21G* molecular orbital calculations, were found to constrain the average structure of each species to a nearly-planar conformation. This suggests that amiloride binds to the ion channel in a planar conformation. In agreement with previous ab initio calculations, the molecular dynamics simulations found the relative internal energy of the Al conformer to be lower than that of A4. However, the solute-solvent interaction energy was lower for A4 than A1, consistent with the larger dipole moment of A4. Combined, these trends still predict the A1 conformer to be more stable in solution than A4. Static solvation studies of amiloride with an induced polarization charge boundary element (IPCBE) continuum solvent method, the Langevin dipole method, and the self-consistent reaction field method gave qualitatively similar results. These results help to clarify the NMR studies of Smith et al. (J. Am. Chem. Sec, 1979, 101, 191), who were unable to distinguish between the A1 and A4 conformers in solution. Calculation of the electrostatic contribution to both the relative hydration enthalpy and the relative hydration free energy of amiloride conformers using the IPCBE method showed that the maximum difference in these quantities is about 4%.
引用
收藏
页码:1502 / 1513
页数:12
相关论文
共 110 条
[51]   MICROSCOPIC AND SEMIMICROSCOPIC CALCULATIONS OF ELECTROSTATIC ENERGIES IN PROTEINS BY THE POLARIS AND ENZYMIX PROGRAMS [J].
LEE, FS ;
CHU, ZT ;
WARSHEL, A .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 1993, 14 (02) :161-185
[52]  
LI JHY, 1985, J MEMBRANE BIOL, V83, P45, DOI 10.1007/BF01868737
[53]   STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP OF AMILORIDE ANALOGS AS BLOCKERS OF EPITHELIAL NA CHANNELS .2. SIDE-CHAIN MODIFICATIONS [J].
LI, JHY ;
CRAGOE, EJ ;
LINDEMANN, B .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE BIOLOGY, 1987, 95 (02) :171-185
[54]   ABSOLUTE PKA CALCULATIONS WITH CONTINUUM DIELECTRIC METHODS [J].
LIM, C ;
BASHFORD, D ;
KARPLUS, M .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY, 1991, 95 (14) :5610-5620
[55]   MICROSCOPIC MODELS FOR QUANTUM-MECHANICAL CALCULATIONS OF CHEMICAL PROCESSES IN SOLUTIONS - LD/AMPAC AND SCAAS/AMPAC CALCULATIONS OF SOLVATION ENERGIES [J].
LUZHKOV, V ;
WARSHEL, A .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 1992, 13 (02) :199-213
[56]   ELECTROSTATIC INTERACTION OF A SOLUTE WITH A CONTINUUM - A DIRECT UTILIZATION OF ABINITIO MOLECULAR POTENTIALS FOR THE PREVISION OF SOLVENT EFFECTS [J].
MIERTUS, S ;
SCROCCO, E ;
TOMASI, J .
CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1981, 55 (01) :117-129
[57]  
Miller T. M., 1978, ADV ATOM MOL PHYS, V13, P1
[58]  
MO O, 1987, J MOL STRUC-THEOCHEM, V150, P135
[59]   CONTINUUM MODEL-CALCULATIONS OF SOLVATION FREE-ENERGIES - ACCURATE EVALUATION OF ELECTROSTATIC CONTRIBUTIONS [J].
MOHAN, V ;
DAVIS, ME ;
MCCAMMON, JA ;
PETTITT, BM .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY, 1992, 96 (15) :6428-6431
[60]   VALIDATION OF THE GENERAL-PURPOSE QUANTA(R)3.2/CHARMM(R) FORCE-FIELD [J].
MOMANY, FA ;
RONE, R .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY, 1992, 13 (07) :888-900