NONINVASIVE EVALUATION OF THE COLLATERAL CIRCULATION TO THE HAND

Objective: To compare four methods of evaluating collateral blood flow to the hand. Methods: The hands of 74 volunteers on the faculty or staff of a university hospital were studied prospectively. Only subjects without known peripheral vascular disease were included. Four tests were used in random order to assess radial and ulnar artery flow. Results of the assessments using the modified Alien's test, pulse oximetry, plethysmography, and laser Doppler perfusion monitoring were compared. Results: No interrupted palmar arch was found. The modified Alien's test was normal in all cases. Pulse oximetry detected a 5% incidence of noticeably reduced blood flow in one artery compared with the other artery. This dominance of one artery was identified in 69% of the hands by plethysmography. The laser Doppler noted a dominant artery in 64% of the hands. Plethysmography and the laser Doppler disagreed in their findings in only 9% of the hands evaluated. Numerical values of blood flow, attainable only by the laser Doppler, were significantly lower upon occlusion of the radial vs the ulnar arteries (p < 0.05; paired t-test). Conclusion: All of the tests provide information about the collateral circulation to the hand. Only the laser Doppler provides quantitative blood flow. Further studies involving subjects most at risk for post-cannulation ischemic injury are needed to guide the clinical application of these findings.