NONVERBAL BEHAVIORS, PERSUASION, AND CREDIBILITY

被引:194
作者
BURGOON, JK [1 ]
BIRK, T [1 ]
PFAU, M [1 ]
机构
[1] AUGUSTANA COLL, SPEECH COMMUN, SIOUX FALLS, SD USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-2958.1990.tb00229.x
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
This study examined the relationships among nonverbal behaviors, dimensions of source credibility, and speaker persuasiveness in a public speaking context. Relevant nonverbal literature was organized according to a Brunswikian lens model. Nonverbal behavioral composites, grouped according to their likely proximal percepts, were hypothesized to significantly affect both credibility and persuasiveness. A sample of 60 speakers gave videotaped speeches that were judged on credibility and persuasiveness by classmates. Pairs of trained raters coded 22 vocalic, kinesic, and proxemic nonverbal behaviors evidenced in the tapes. Results confirmed numerous associations between nonverbal behaviors and attributions of credibility and persuasiveness. Greater perceived competence and composure were associated with greater vocal and facial pleasantness, with greater facial expressiveness contributing to competence perceptions. Greater sociability was associated with more kinesic/proxemic immediacy, dominance, and relaxation and with vocal pleasantness. Most of these same cues also enhanced character judgments. No cues were related to dynamism judgments. Greater perceived persuasiveness correlated with greater vocal pleasantness (especially fluency and pitch variety), kinesic/proxemic immediacy, facial expressiveness, and kinesic relaxation (especially high random movement but little tension). All five dimensions of credibility related to persuasiveness. Advantages of analyzing nonverbal cues according to proximal percepts are discussed. Copyright © 1990, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:140 / 169
页数:30
相关论文
共 95 条
[1]  
ADDINGTON DW, 1971, SPEECH MONOGR, V38, P242
[2]   A SUMMARY OF EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH IN ETHOS [J].
ANDERSEN, K ;
CLEVENGER, T .
SPEECH MONOGRAPHS, 1963, 30 (02) :59-78
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1982, COMMUNICATION
[4]  
[Anonymous], INT J SOCIOL LANGUAG
[5]   EFFECTS OF PITCH AND SPEECH RATE ON PERSONAL ATTRIBUTIONS [J].
APPLE, W ;
STREETER, LA ;
KRAUSS, RM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1979, 37 (05) :715-727
[6]  
ARONOVITCH CD, 1976, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V33, P255
[7]   THE EFFECT OF RELEVANT AND IRRELEVANT ASPECTS OF COMMUNICATOR CREDIBILITY ON OPINION CHANGE [J].
ARONSON, E ;
GOLDEN, BW .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 1962, 30 (02) :135-146
[8]  
Barge J. K., 1989, SO COMMUNICATION J, V54, P330, DOI DOI 10.1080/10417948909372766
[9]   ASPECTS OF LANGUAGE PRAGMATICS AND SOCIAL PERCEPTION OF LYING [J].
BASKETT, GD ;
FREEDLE, RO .
JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLINGUISTIC RESEARCH, 1974, 3 (02) :117-131
[10]  
Beebe S. A, 1980, AUSTR SCAN J HUMAN C, V7, P57