HUND RULES, THE ALTERNATING RULE, AND SYMMETRY HOLES

被引:50
作者
MORGAN, JD
KUTZELNIGG, W
机构
[1] HARVARD UNIV,DEPT CHEM,CAMBRIDGE,MA 02138
[2] RUHR UNIV BOCHUM,LEHRSTUHL THEORET CHEM,W-4630 BOCHUM,GERMANY
[3] UNIV DELAWARE,DEPT PHYS & ASTRON,NEWARK,DE 19716
关键词
D O I
10.1021/j100112a051
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
We review attempts to explain Hund's first rule, that a triplet state should lie below a singlet state of the same configuration, as a consequence of the ''Fermi hole' in the triplet state electron-electron distribution function. After describing the failure of such attempts, and reviewing the types of exceptions to Hund's first rule, we examine the ''alternating rule'', which accounts for most of the known exceptions. We show that the alternating rule is associated with whether the parity of the two-electron wave function is natural or unnatural. We show that whereas in the case of natural parity the triplet correlation function has a broad Fermi hole and the singlet correlation function does not, in the case of unnatural parity the singlet correlation function has a quartic ''symmetry hole'' that i:s even broader than the quadratic Fermi hole of the triplet correlation function. Thus this more general perspective provides a relationship between the ordering of singlet/triplet energy levels and the breadth of their respective symmetry holes. We argue that although the breadth of symmetry holes cannot be said to cause the ordering of singlet/triplet energy levels, both phenomena are consequences of factors of (-1)S+L+l1+l2 in the construction of the properly antisymmetrized eigenfunctions of spin and angular variables; hence the two phenomena are closely associated, although neither is the cause of the other.
引用
收藏
页码:2425 / 2434
页数:10
相关论文
共 45 条
[21]   SINGLET-TRIPLET EXPECTATION VALUE DIFFERENCES FOR 2-ELECTRON IONS [J].
KILLINGBECK, J .
MOLECULAR PHYSICS, 1973, 25 (02) :455-459
[22]   DIFFERENCE IN ENERGY BETWEEN SINGLET AND TRIPLET-STATES [J].
KOHL, DA .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1972, 56 (08) :4236-&
[23]   VIOLATION OF HUND RULE BY SPIN POLARIZATION IN MOLECULES [J].
KOLLMAR, H ;
STAEMMLER, V .
THEORETICA CHIMICA ACTA, 1978, 48 (03) :223-239
[24]   RATES OF CONVERGENCE OF THE PARTIAL-WAVE EXPANSIONS OF ATOMIC CORRELATION ENERGIES [J].
KUTZELNIGG, W ;
MORGAN, JD .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1992, 96 (06) :4484-4508
[25]  
KUTZELNIGG W, 1990, THEORETICAL MODELS 2, P1
[26]   REMARKS CONCERNING THEORETICAL EXPLANATION OF HUNDS RULE [J].
LEMBERGER, A ;
PAUNCZ, R .
ACTA PHYSICA ACADEMIAE SCIENTIARUM HUNGARICAE, 1969, 27 (1-4) :169-+
[27]  
LIEB EH, 1977, COMMUN MATH PHYS, V53, P191
[28]  
LINDE A, 1984, DENTIN DENTINOGENESI, V2, P55
[29]  
LINDGREN I, 1986, ATOMIC MANY BODY THE, P78
[30]  
MAKSIC ZB, 1990, CONCEPT CHEM BOND, P1