FLEXIBILITY TRADE-OFFS IN A RANDOM FLEXIBLE MANUFACTURING SYSTEM - A SIMULATION STUDY

被引:26
作者
GUPTA, YP
GOYAL, S
机构
[1] Department of Management, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY
[2] Department of Management Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON
关键词
D O I
10.1080/00207549208942910
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Flexible manufacturing systems (FMSs) are allowing firms to take advantage of diversified, low volume production of products with short life-cycles. The flexibility provided by an FMS improves the ability of a system to respond to change. Several types of manufacturing flexibility (MF) have been identified in the literature. Ideally, it is desirable to provide an FMS with all types of flexibility. However, there is a general consensus on the discordant nature of some of the flexibilities. This makes it imperative for management to recognize which flexibilities it deems critical to the manufacturing strategy of the firm. This allows the management to trade-off some of the less important flexibilities for the more important ones, as the need arises. This study is an attempt toward an empirical examination of the flexibility trade-offs in an FMS. By using computer simulation, we study the flexibility trade-offs in the stochastic environment of a random FMS. Various configurations of the FMS are simulated under the influence of a variety of loading and dispatching strategies. The results show that there is a trade-off among the various flexibility types under most circumstances. However, some scenarios illustrate that an appropriate combination of the variables like scheduling environment, product variety, and system configuration, can be effective in containing these trade-offs. In other cases, it is seen that the FMS can accommodate more than one flexibility type simultaneously.
引用
收藏
页码:527 / 557
页数:31
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
Abed S.Y., Barta T.A., McRoberts K.L., A quantitative comparison of three simulation languages: SLAM, GPSS/H, SIMSCRIPT, Computers and Industrial Engineering, 9, 1, pp. 45-66, (1985)
[2]  
Balci O., Sargent R.G., A bibliography on the credibility, assessment, and validation of simulation and mathematical models, Simuletter, 15, 3, pp. 15-27, (1984)
[3]  
Bastos J.M., Batching and routeing: Two functions in the operational planning of flexible manufacturing systems, European Journal of Operational Research, 33, 3, pp. 230-244, (1988)
[4]  
Bobrowski P.M., Mabert V.A., Alternate routing strategies in batch manufacturing: An evaluation, Decision Sciences, 19, 4, pp. 713-733, (1988)
[5]  
Browne J., Dubois D., Rathmill K., Sethi S.P., Steckf K.E., Classification of flexible manufacturing systems, The FMS Magazine, 2, 2, pp. 114-117, (1984)
[6]  
Buzacott J.A., The fundamental principles of flexibility in manufacturing systems, Proceedings of the 1St International Conference on FMS, pp. 23-30, (1982)
[7]  
Buzacott J.A., Mandelbaum M., Flexibility and productivity in manufacturing systems, Proceedings of the Annual HE Conference, pp. 404-413, (1985)
[8]  
Buzacott J.A., Shanthikumar J.G., Models for understanding flexible manufacturing systems, AIIE Transactions, 12, 4, pp. 339-350, (1980)
[9]  
Carmer S.G., Swanson M.R., An evaluation of ten pairwise multiple comparison procedures by monte carlo methods, Journal of American Statistical Association, 68, 341, pp. 66-74, (1973)
[10]  
Carson J.S., Convincing users of model's validity is challenging aspects of modeler's job, Industrial Engineering, 18, pp. 74-85, (1986)