A COMPARISON AND AN EXPLORATION OF THE FORECASTING ACCURACY OF A LOGLINEAR MODEL AT DIFFERENT LEVELS OF AGGREGATION

被引:29
作者
FOEKENS, EW [1 ]
LEEFLANG, PSH [1 ]
WITTINK, DR [1 ]
机构
[1] CORNELL UNIV,JOHNSON GRAD SCH MANAGEMENT,ITHACA,NY 14853
关键词
LOGLINEAR MODEL; AGGREGATE AND DISAGGREGATE SCANNER DATA; EMPIRICAL STUDY; FORECASTING ACCURACY AT AGGREGATE LEVEL;
D O I
10.1016/0169-2070(94)90005-1
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We compare the SCAN*PRO model of retail promotion effects, at different levels of aggregation. The alternative model specifications are: (1) store-level models with homogeneous or heterogeneous response parameters across retail chains, and with or without weekly indicator variables, (2) chain-level models with homogeneous or heterogeneous response parameters across retail chains, and (3) a market-level model. Based on scanner data, we show comparisons between the models in terms of relative frequencies of statistically significant parameter estimates in the expected range of values. Sales forecasts are compared at two levels viz. chain and market level. We find that a comparison of the relative frequencies favors the homogeneous store models (with or without weekly indicators), while the forecasting accuracy examined at both the chain and market levels is superior for chain-specific store models without weekly indicator variables. We also examine differences in the mean squared error between the estimation and validation samples.
引用
收藏
页码:245 / 261
页数:17
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   AN IMPLEMENTED SYSTEM FOR IMPROVING PROMOTION PRODUCTIVITY USING STORE SCANNER DATA [J].
ABRAHAM, MM ;
LODISH, LM .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 1993, 12 (03) :248-269
[2]  
AIGNER DJ, 1973, REV ECON STAT, V55, P114, DOI 10.2307/1928002
[3]   ESTIMATION AND PREDICTION FROM AGGREGATE DATA WHEN AGGREGATES ARE MEASURED MORE ACCURATELY THAN THEIR COMPONENTS [J].
AIGNER, DJ ;
GOLDFELD, SM .
ECONOMETRICA, 1974, 42 (01) :113-134
[4]   THERE IS NO AGGREGATION BIAS - WHY MACRO LOGIT-MODELS WORK [J].
ALLENBY, GM ;
ROSSI, PE .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & ECONOMIC STATISTICS, 1991, 9 (01) :1-15
[5]  
ALSEM KJ, 1989, INT J RES MARK, V6, P183
[6]   ERROR MEASURES FOR GENERALIZING ABOUT FORECASTING METHODS - EMPIRICAL COMPARISONS [J].
ARMSTRONG, JS ;
COLLOPY, F .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 1992, 8 (01) :69-80
[7]  
Belsley D. A., 1980, REGRESSION DIAGNOSTI
[8]   SERIAL-CORRELATION AND THE FIXED EFFECTS MODEL [J].
BHARGAVA, A ;
FRANZINI, L ;
NARENDRANATHAN, W .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1982, 49 (04) :533-549
[9]   HOW MUCH BETTER IS DISAGGREGATE DATA [J].
BINKLEY, JK ;
NELSON, CH .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 1990, 32 (02) :137-140
[10]   PRICE-INDUCED PATTERNS OF COMPETITION [J].
BLATTBERG, RC ;
WISNIEWSKI, KJ .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 1989, 8 (04) :291-309