Decomposing the value of department store shopping into utilitarian, hedonic and social dimensions Evidence from Finland

被引:324
作者
Rintamaki, Timo [1 ]
Kanto, Antti [2 ]
Kuusela, Hannu [1 ]
Spence, Mark T. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tampere, Sch Business Adm, Tampere, Finland
[2] Helsinki Sch Econ & Business Adm, Helsinki, Finland
[3] Bond Univ, Bond, Australia
关键词
Social values; Shopping; Department stores; Consumer behaviour; Finland;
D O I
10.1108/09590550610642792
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to decompose total customer value as perceived by department store shoppers into utilitarian, hedonic and social dimensions, and empirically test this conceptualization in a Finnish department store shopping context. Design/methodology/approach - Data were collected by a questionnaire administered over three days at a department store that generates the second largest turnover in Finland. A total of 364 shoppers completed the questionnaire. Findings - Empirical evidence supports our tripartite conceptualization of total customer value. In particular, social value is an independent construct. Further, social value varies by day-of-week, with a significant increase on Saturday (versus weekdays) when the store is more crowded, whereas no such differences in utilitarian and hedonic values were detected. Originality/value - The principal contribution is a tripartite conceptualization of total customer value that incorporates utilitarian, social and hedonic value dimensions in a department store shopping context. Individually these dimensions are all well rooted in streams of consumer behavior literature, albeit mostly at the product or brand, not the store, level. Increasing our understanding of these softer aspects of shopping, particularly the social dimension, is important because they represent possible differentiating factors in the highly competitive and often commoditized retail markets.
引用
收藏
页码:6 / +
页数:28
相关论文
共 51 条
[41]   Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale [J].
Sweeney, JC ;
Soutar, GN .
JOURNAL OF RETAILING, 2001, 77 (02) :203-220
[42]   WHY DO PEOPLE SHOP [J].
TAUBER, EM .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1972, 36 (04) :46-49
[43]   Atmospheric effects on shopping behavior: A review of the experimental evidence [J].
Turley, LW ;
Milliman, RE .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2000, 49 (02) :193-211
[44]  
Veblen T, 1967, THEORY LEISURE CLASS
[45]  
Vriens M, 2000, MARK RES, V12, P5
[46]   Excitement at the mall: Determinants and effects on shopping response [J].
Wakefield, KL ;
Baker, J .
JOURNAL OF RETAILING, 1998, 74 (04) :515-539
[47]  
WESTBROOK RA, 1985, J RETAILING, V61, P78
[48]  
Wolf M. J., 1999, ENTERTAINMENT EC MEG
[49]   Customer value: The next source for competitive advantage [J].
Woodruff, RB .
JOURNAL OF THE ACADEMY OF MARKETING SCIENCE, 1997, 25 (02) :139-153
[50]  
Woods W.A., 1981, CONSUMER BEHAV ADAPT