Digital discretion: A systematic literature review of ICT and street-level discretion

被引:131
作者
Busch, Peter Andre [1 ]
Henriksen, Helle Zinner [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Agder, Dept Informat Syst, POB 422, N-4604 Kristiansand, Norway
[2] Copenhagen Business Sch, Dept Digitalizat, Frederiksberg, Denmark
关键词
ICT; e-government; discretion; street-level bureaucracy; literature review;
D O I
10.3233/IP-170050
中图分类号
G25 [图书馆学、图书馆事业]; G35 [情报学、情报工作];
学科分类号
1205 ; 120501 ;
摘要
This study reviews 44 peer-reviewed articles on digital discretion published in the period from 1998 to January 2017. Street-level bureaucrats have traditionally had a wide ability to exercise discretion stirring debate since they can add their personal footprint to public policies. Digital discretion is suggested to reduce this footprint by influencing or replacing their discretionary practices using ICT. What is less researched is whether digital discretion can cause changes in public policy outcomes, and under what conditions such changes can occur. Using the concept of public service values, we suggest that digital discretion can strengthen ethical and democratic values but weaken professional and relational values. Furthermore, we conclude that contextual factors such as considerations made by policy makers on the macro-level and the degree of professionalization of street-level bureaucrats on the micro-level are important for understanding the diffusion and impact of digital discretion. In addition, inherent features of technology can be discussed at all levels in relation to their aims and tasks. We conclude that the scope of street-level bureaucracy is decreasing, and more and more street-level bureaucracies are turned into digital bureaucracies characterized by digital bureaucrats operating computers instead of interacting face-to-face with clients.
引用
收藏
页码:3 / 28
页数:26
相关论文
共 91 条
[11]   Public Value Governance: Moving beyond Traditional Public Administration and the New Public Management [J].
Bryson, John M. ;
Crosby, Barbara C. ;
Bloomberg, Laura .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2014, 74 (04) :445-456
[12]   Street-Level Bureaucracy and E-Government [J].
Buffat, Aurelien .
PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2015, 17 (01) :149-161
[13]  
Busch PA, 2017, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 50TH ANNUAL HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES, P2963
[14]   E-government and organizational change: Reappraising the role of ICT and bureaucracy in public service delivery [J].
Cordella, Antonio ;
Tempini, Niccolo .
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2015, 32 (03) :279-286
[15]   What is Big Data? A Consensual Definition and a Review of Key Research Topics [J].
De Mauro, Andrea ;
Greco, Marco ;
Grimaldi, Michele .
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INTEGRATED INFORMATION (IC-ININFO 2014), 2015, 1644 :97-104
[16]   Street-Level Strategies of Child Welfare Social Workers in Flanders: The Use of Electronic Client Records in Practice [J].
De Witte, Jasper ;
Declercq, Anja ;
Hermans, Koen .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2016, 46 (05) :1249-1265
[17]   Policy Rationales for Electronic Information Systems: An Area of Ambiguity [J].
Devlieghere, Jochen ;
Bradt, Lieve ;
Roose, Rudi .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2017, 47 (05) :1500-1516
[18]   Artificial Intelligence in Medicine and Cardiac Imaging: Harnessing Big Data and Advanced Computing to Provide Personalized Medical Diagnosis and Treatment [J].
Dilsizian, Steven E. ;
Siegel, Eliot L. .
CURRENT CARDIOLOGY REPORTS, 2014, 16 (01)
[19]   A comprehensive framework for the assessment of eGovernment projects [J].
Esteves, Jose ;
Joseph, Rhoda C. .
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2008, 25 (01) :118-132
[20]   Street-level bureaucracy, social work and the (Exaggerated) death of discretion [J].
Evans, T ;
Harris, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SOCIAL WORK, 2004, 34 (06) :871-895