SELF-EFFICACY BELIEFS - COMPARISON OF 5 MEASURES

被引:216
作者
LEE, C [1 ]
BOBKO, P [1 ]
机构
[1] RUTGERS STATE UNIV,DEPT MANAGEMENT,NEW BRUNSWICK,NJ 08903
关键词
D O I
10.1037/0021-9010.79.3.364
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
In 2 studies, the researchers compared 5 ways of operationalizing self-efficacy that are commonly found in the literature and assessed the antecedents and consequences of self-efficacy on the basis of A. Bandura's (1986) conceptualization. Results indicated that measuring self-efficacy by using a task-specific, 1-item confidence rating the lowest convergent validity with the other self-efficacy operationalizations and showed the least consistency in its correlation with the hypothesized self-efficacy antecedents and outcomes. Furthermore, self-efficacy magnitude and self-efficacy strength (combining all the certainty answers) appeared to be inferior to self-efficacy composites based on combining only the strength items where the magnitude response was ''yes, I can perform at that level.''
引用
收藏
页码:364 / 369
页数:6
相关论文
共 35 条