Information Technologies: What You See Is Not (Always) What You Get

被引:30
作者
Salomon, Gavriel [1 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, Sch Educ, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
关键词
D O I
10.1207/s15326985ep2004_5
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The purpose of this paper is to draw attention to the gap between the learning potentials afforded by computers and the actual learning from them. A computer's unique potentials emanate from the kinds and varieties of four basic attributes that it offers: information, symbol systems, user activities, and relations with user. These attributes may affect four corresponding cognitions-knowledge structures, internal modes of representation, mental operations, and attitudes and perceptions respectively-by either activating, supplanting, or short-circuiting them. Such effects could be obtained through "low road" learning, which is practice-intensive, leading to near automatic responses, or through "high road" learning, which is thinking-intensive (i.e., nonautomatic operations are mindfully employed). The high road is seen as the more feasible and promising road to conceptual learning of the kind computers can facilitate. However, the extent to which high road learning actually occurs greatly depends on learners' volitional mindfulness, itself partly determined by the nature of the materials encountered and partly by personological, perceptual, and attitudinal factors. It is argued that the opportunity for mapping computers' attributes on their corresponding cognitions, although often available, does not always take place because learners do not always become mindful on their own. A computer's promise does not lie in its attributes alone, unique and powerful as they may be, but in how mindfully learners come to handle them. One important computer attribute-the partnerlike relationships with learners that it permits-and a number of instructional practices are discussed as possible means to promote and sustain learners' mindfulness.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 216
页数:10
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   SELF-EFFICACY MECHANISM IN HUMAN AGENCY [J].
BANDURA, A .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1982, 37 (02) :122-147
[2]   QUALITY OF LEARNING WITH AN ACTIVE VERSUS PASSIVE MOTIVATIONAL SET [J].
BENWARE, CA ;
DECI, EL .
AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 1984, 21 (04) :755-765
[3]   EFFECTS OF NEED FOR COGNITION ON MESSAGE EVALUATION, RECALL, AND PERSUASION [J].
CACIOPPO, JT ;
PETTY, RE ;
MORRIS, KJ .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1983, 45 (04) :805-818
[4]  
Cambre M. A., 1985, Journal of Educational Computing Research, V1, P37, DOI 10.2190/FK5L-092H-T6YB-PYBA
[5]  
CHANOWITZ B, 1980, HUMAN HELPLESSNESS T, P97
[6]  
CLARK RE, 1986, HDB RES TEACHING, V3
[7]   EFFECTS OF COMPUTER-PROGRAMMING ON YOUNG CHILDRENS COGNITION [J].
CLEMENTS, DH ;
GULLO, DF .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1984, 76 (06) :1051-1058
[8]  
COLE M, 1983, Q NEWSLETTER LAB COM
[9]  
Corno LA, 1983, EDUC PSYCHOL, V18, P88, DOI DOI 10.1080/00461528309529266
[10]   LEVELS OF PROCESSING - FRAMEWORK FOR MEMORY RESEARCH [J].
CRAIK, FIM ;
LOCKHART, RS .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1972, 11 (06) :671-684