The EC/HO international validation study on alternatives to the Draize eye irritation test

被引:201
作者
Balls, M
Botham, PA
Bruner, LH
Spielmann, H
机构
[1] ZENECA,CENT TOXICOL LAB,MACCLESFIELD SK10 4TJ,CHESHIRE,ENGLAND
[2] PROCTER & GAMBLE HLTH & BEAUTY CARE EUROPEAN,EGHAM TW20 9NW,SURREY,ENGLAND
[3] BGVV,ZEBET,D-12277 BERLIN,GERMANY
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0887-2333(95)00092-5
中图分类号
R99 [毒物学(毒理学)];
学科分类号
100405 ;
摘要
This is the final report of the Management Team for a European Commission/British Home Office (EC/HO) validation study on alternatives to the Draize eye irritation test. The principal goal of the study was to establish whether one or more of nine non-animal tests could be used to replace the Draize test for all severely irritating materials (or those belonging to specific classes) or the animal test completely for chemicals with or without regard to chemical class. Sixty chemicals were independently selected, coded and supplied, then the data obtained in 37 laboratories were analysed independently. The results of comparisons between 27 alternative test index scores and the Modified Maximum Average Scores (MMASs) obtained in the Draize eye test were compared. Tables of results showing Pearson's product moment correlation coefficients and Spearman's rank coefficients for each laboratory are provided, and correlation matrices of alternative test index scores among the different groups of laboratories are shown for each endpoint. Scatterplots are provided, in which the alternative test scores obtained by the lead laboratories for the nine tests are plotted against the MMAS for the full set of chemicals and 12 surfactants. It is concluded that, with the possible exception of predicting the irritancy of surfactants, none of the nine tests met any of the four performance targets. Possible reasons for this outcome are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:871 / 929
页数:59
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [21] GORDON VC, 1987, ALTERNATIVE METHODS, V5, P87
  • [22] Kay J., 1962, J SOC COSMET CHEM, V13, P281
  • [23] PRINCIPLES FOR A PRAGMATIC APPROACH TO THE REGULATORY ACCEPTANCE OF ALTERNATIVE TESTS
    KOETER, HBWM
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO, 1994, 8 (04) : 925 - 930
  • [24] A COMPARISON OF 2 CYTOTOXICITY TESTS FOR PREDICTING THE OCULAR IRRITANCY OF SURFACTANTS
    LEWIS, RW
    MCCALL, JC
    BOTHAM, PA
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO, 1993, 7 (02) : 155 - 158
  • [25] Alternatives in cosmetics testing
    Loprieno, N
    Bruner, LH
    Carr, GJ
    Chamberlain, M
    Cottin, M
    DeSilva, O
    Kato, S
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO, 1995, 9 (06) : 827 - 838
  • [26] HENS EGG CHORIOALLANTOIC MEMBRANE TEST FOR IRRITATION POTENTIAL
    LUEPKE, NP
    [J]. FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1985, 23 (02) : 287 - 291
  • [27] AN IN-VITRO STUDY OF THE EYE IRRITATION POTENTIAL OF NEW SHAMPOO FORMULATIONS
    OBRIEN, KAF
    BASKETTER, DA
    JONES, P
    DIXIT, M
    [J]. TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO, 1994, 8 (02) : 257 - 261
  • [28] PAPE W J W, 1987, Molecular Toxicology, V1, P525
  • [29] PRINSEN MK, 1992, 10TH ANN CAAT M
  • [30] Ryan B. F., 1985, MINITAB HDB