MECHANISMS OF ELECTRICAL DEFIBRILLATION - IMPACT OF NEW EXPERIMENTAL DEFIBRILLATOR WAVE-FORMS

被引:36
作者
BLANCHARD, SM
IDEKER, RE
机构
[1] DUKE UNIV,MED CTR,DEPT PATHOL,DURHAM,NC 27710
[2] DUKE UNIV,MED CTR,DEPT BIOMED ENGN,DURHAM,NC 27710
[3] DUKE UNIV,MED CTR,DEPT MED,DURHAM,NC 27710
关键词
D O I
10.1016/0002-8703(94)90075-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Six possible explanations for why same biphasic waveforms have lower defibrillation thresholds than monophasic waveforms of the same duration are as follows: (1) the impedance for the second phase of the biphasic shock is very low because electrode polarization develops during the first phase; (2) the large change in voltage between the first and second phases of a biphasic waveform is responsible for the increased defibrillation efficacy; (3) biphasic waveforms cause less severe detrimental effects in regions of high potential gradient; (4) the first phase of the biphasic waveform restores activity of the sodium channels, which makes defibrillation easier for the second phase; (5) the potential gradient required for defibrillation is less for biphasic waveforms than for monophasic waveforms; and (6) biphasic waveforms are better able to stimulate the myocardium to induce new action potentials or to cause refractory period prolongation. Evidence shows that, while a few of these proposed mechanisms are incorrect, several of the others may together contribute to the general superiority of biphasic waveforms.
引用
收藏
页码:970 / 977
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[11]   STRENGTH DURATION AND PROBABILITY OF SUCCESS CURVES FOR DEFIBRILLATION WITH BIPHASIC WAVE-FORMS [J].
FEESER, SA ;
TANG, ASL ;
KAVANAGH, KM ;
ROLLINS, DL ;
SMITH, WM ;
WOLF, PD ;
IDEKER, RE .
CIRCULATION, 1990, 82 (06) :2128-2141
[12]   IS THE 2ND PHASE OF A BIPHASIC DEFIBRILLATION WAVE-FORM THE DEFIBRILLATING PHASE [J].
HILLSLEY, RE ;
WALKER, RG ;
SWANSON, DK ;
ROLLINS, DL ;
WOLF, PD ;
SMITH, WM ;
IDEKER, RE .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1993, 16 (07) :1401-1411
[13]  
IDEKER RE, 1991, SUDDEN CARDIAC DEATH, P133
[14]  
JOHNSON EE, 1992, AM HEART J, V124, P836
[15]   IMPROVED CARDIAC CELL EXCITATION WITH SYMMETRICAL BIPHASIC DEFIBRILLATOR WAVEFORMS [J].
JONES, JL ;
JONES, RE ;
BALASKY, G .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1987, 253 (06) :H1418-H1424
[16]   POSTSHOCK ARRHYTHMIAS - POSSIBLE CAUSE OF UNSUCCESSFUL DEFIBRILLATION [J].
JONES, JL ;
JONES, RE .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1980, 8 (03) :167-171
[17]   COMPARISON OF THE INTERNAL DEFIBRILLATION THRESHOLDS FOR MONOPHASIC AND DOUBLE AND SINGLE CAPACITOR BIPHASIC WAVEFORMS [J].
KAVANAGH, KM ;
TANG, ASL ;
ROLLINS, DL ;
SMITH, WM ;
IDEKER, RE .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1989, 14 (05) :1343-1349
[18]  
KAVANAGH KM, 1993, PACE, V16, P916
[19]   EFFECT OF INTRASTIMULUS POLARITY REVERSAL ON ELECTRIC-FIELD STIMULATION THRESHOLDS IN FROG AND RABBIT MYOCARDIUM [J].
KNISLEY, SB ;
SMITH, WM ;
IDEKER, RE .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1992, 3 (03) :239-254
[20]   MYOCARDIAL INJURY AND INDUCTION OF ARRHYTHMIA BY DIRECT-CURRENT SHOCK DELIVERED VIA ENDOCARDIAL CATHETERS IN DOGS [J].
LERMAN, BB ;
WEISS, JL ;
BULKLEY, BH ;
BECKER, LC ;
WEISFELDT, ML .
CIRCULATION, 1984, 69 (05) :1006-1012