燃油税作为控制碳排放政策工具的争议与思考

被引:4
作者
张可云
张理芃
机构
[1] 中国人民大学区域与城市经济研究所
关键词
燃油税; 控制碳排放; 政策工具; 争议;
D O I
10.16064/j.cnki.cn34-1003/g0.2011.02.001
中图分类号
X-01 [环境保护政策及其阐述]; F426.22 []; F812.42 [税收];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
燃油税作为控制碳排放的主要政策工具之一,引起了广泛争议。褒贬双方通过弹性估计和数值模拟,分别在微观和宏观两个层次,围绕减排效果、福利损失和社会公平等三个方面开展经验研究,结论表明燃油税的政策效果将严重依赖于纳税者的属性和征税时的宏观经济状况,同时相关配套措施对社会福利的改善显著。本文首先梳理出争议存在的焦点,然后回顾过往有价值的文献,追溯争议的来源并详尽综述了用于估计弹性和开展数值模拟主要采用的方法,再探讨最优的税率和税制,并归纳主要的政策综合方案,最后针对中国实际给出一些结论和建议。
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 20+38 +38
页数:9
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   The optimal gas tax for California [J].
Lin, C. -Y. Cynthia ;
Prince, Lea .
ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (12) :5173-5183
[2]   Evidence of a shift in the short-run price elasticity of gasoline demand [J].
Hughes, Jonathan E. ;
Knittel, Christopher R. ;
Sperling, Daniel .
ENERGY JOURNAL, 2008, 29 (01) :113-134
[3]   Does Britain or the United States have the right gasoline tax? [J].
Parry, IWH ;
Small, KA .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2005, 95 (04) :1276-1289
[4]  
Incidence of federal and state gasoline taxes[J] . Hayley Chouinard,Jeffrey M Perloff.Economics Letters . 2003 (1)
[5]   Can oil shocks explain asymmetries in the US Business Cycle? [J].
Clements, Michael P. ;
Krolzig, Hans-Martin .
EMPIRICAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 27 (02) :185-204
[6]  
The Demand for Automobile Fuel: A Survey of Elasticities[J] . Daniel J. Graham,Stephen Glaister.Journal of Transport Economics and Policy . 2002 (1)
[7]   A model system for the assessment of the effects of car and fuel green taxes on CO2 emission [J].
Hayashi, Y ;
Kato, H ;
Teodoro, RVR .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2001, 6 (02) :123-139
[8]   The effectiveness of gasoline taxation to manage air pollution [J].
Sipes, KN ;
Mendelsohn, R .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2001, 36 (02) :299-309
[9]  
Gasoline demand and car choice: estimating gasoline demand using household information[J] . Hilke A Kayser.Energy Economics . 2000 (3)
[10]  
Environmental Tax Reform and Producer Foresight[J] . Brita Bye.Journal of Policy Modeling . 2000 (6)