Proposal of a classification system for patients with neck pain

被引:83
作者
Childs, MJD
Fritz, JM
Piva, SR
Whitman, JA
机构
[1] Wilford Hall USAF Med Ctr, Dept Phys Therapy, San Antonio, TX 78236 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Phys Therapy, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Univ Utah, Dept Phys Therapy, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[4] Intermt Hlth Care, Salt Lake City, UT USA
关键词
conservative treatment; decision making; diagnosis; neck pain; staging;
D O I
10.2519/jospt.2004.34.11.686
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
It is likely that patients with neck pain are not a homogeneous group, but, instead, consist of a variety of subgroups, each of which may benefit from a specific intervention matched to the patient's signs and symptoms. Studies to date have largely failed to account for this possibility, which may compromise the statistical power of research and ultimately fail to provide guidance for clinical decision making. Classification provides a means of breaking down a larger entity into more homogeneous subgroups of patients, based on examination data. Classification can guide the determination of a patient's prognosis, and the selection of the most appropriate intervention strategy. Classification has received considerable attention in the management of patients with low back pain, and evidence is emerging regarding its benefits. There has been considerably less effort made towards examining classification as it pertains to patients with neck pain. The purpose of this clinical commentary is to examine the current literature and to propose a classification system for patients with neck pain, based on the overall goal of treatment. The approach is based on published evidence when possible and is also informed by clinical experience and expert opinion. Classification decisions are based on the integration of data from a variety of information from the history and physical examination. The end result of the classification process is to determine the treatment approach believed to be most likely to maximize the clinical outcome for an individual patient with neck pain.
引用
收藏
页码:686 / 696
页数:11
相关论文
共 102 条
[51]   Prognostic factors for perceived pain and function at one-year follow-up in primary care patients with neck pain [J].
Kjellman, G ;
Skargren, E ;
Öberg, B .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2002, 24 (07) :364-370
[52]  
Kjellman GV, 1999, SCAND J REHABIL MED, V31, P139
[53]  
KOES BW, 1993, J MANIP PHYSIOL THER, V16, P211
[54]  
Korthals-de Bos IBC, 2003, BRIT MED J, V326, P911
[55]   Why has the search for causes of low back pain largely been nonconclusive? [J].
LeboeufYde, C ;
Lauritsen, JM ;
Lauritzen, T .
SPINE, 1997, 22 (08) :877-881
[56]   Can chronic disability be prevented? A randomized trial of a cognitive-behavior intervention and two forms of information for patients with spinal pain [J].
Linton, SJ ;
Andersson, T .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (21) :2825-2831
[57]   A review of psychological risk factors in back and neck pain [J].
Linton, SJ .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (09) :1148-1156
[58]   Preventive interventions for back and neck pain problems - What is the evidence? [J].
Linton, SJ ;
van Tulder, MW .
SPINE, 2001, 26 (07) :778-787
[59]   A population-based, randomized clinical trial on back pain management [J].
Loisel, P ;
Abenhaim, L ;
Durand, P ;
Esdaile, JM ;
Suissa, S ;
Gosselin, L ;
Simard, R ;
Turcotte, J ;
Lemaire, J .
SPINE, 1997, 22 (24) :2911-2918
[60]   THE CENTRALIZATION PHENOMENON - ITS USEFULNESS AS A PREDICTOR OF OUTCOME IN CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT OF CHRONIC LOW-BACK-PAIN (A PILOT-STUDY) [J].
LONG, AL .
SPINE, 1995, 20 (23) :2513-2520