Comparison of a multi-leaf collimator with conformal blocks for the delivery of stereotactically guided conformal radiotherapy

被引:22
作者
Adams, EJ
Cosgrove, VP
Shepherd, SF
Warrington, AP
Bedford, JL
Mubata, CD
Bidmead, AM
Brada, M
机构
[1] Royal Marsdewn NHS Trust, Joint Dept Phys, Sutton SM2 5PT, Surrey, England
[2] Royal Marsden Hosp, Sutton, Surrey, England
[3] Inst Canc Res, Neurooncol Unit, Sutton, Surrey, England
[4] Inst Canc Res, Acad Unit Radiotherapy & Oncol, Sutton, Surrey, England
关键词
stereotactic radiotherapy; conformal; multi-leaf collimator;
D O I
10.1016/S0167-8140(99)00062-6
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Stereotactically-guided conformal radiotherapy is a practical technique for irradiating irregular lesions in the brain. The shaping of the conformal fields may be achieved using lead alloy blocks, a conventional multi-leaf collimator (MLC) or a mini/micro-MLC. Although the former gives more precise shaping, it is labour intensive. The latter methods are more practical as both mould room and treatment room times are reduced, hut the shaping is limited by the finite leaf-width. This study compares treatment plans, in terms of normal tissue doses and tumour coverage, for fields shaped using conformal blocks and a conventional MLC in two series of geometrical shapes and nine patient rumours. For the range cif tumour sizes considered (volumes 14-264 cm(3), minimum dimension 30 mm, maximum 102 mm), the MLC treats, on average, 14% (range 3-34%) and 17% (range 0-36%) more normal brain tissue than conformal blocks to >50% and >80% of the prescription dose, respectively. The large variability is due to strong dependence on tumour shape and the presence of partial leaf-widths in the MLC fit. It is therefore important to consider both of these effects when deciding whether the MLC is appropriate for a particular target volume. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 209
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   A digital method for computing target margins in radiotherapy [J].
Bedford, JL ;
Shentall, GS .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 25 (02) :224-231
[2]   STATIC-FIELD CONFORMAL STEREOTAXIC RADIOSURGERY - PHYSICAL TECHNIQUES [J].
BOURLAND, JD ;
MCCOLLOUGH, KP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1994, 28 (02) :471-479
[3]   Three dimensional conformal treatment planning with multileaf collimators [J].
Brewster, L ;
Mohan, R ;
Mageras, G ;
Burman, C ;
Leibel, S ;
Fuks, Z .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1995, 33 (05) :1081-1089
[4]   A comparison of multileaf-collimator and alloy-block field shaping [J].
Galvin, JM ;
Han, K ;
Cohen, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1998, 40 (03) :721-731
[5]   RELOCATABLE FRAME FOR STEREOTAXIC EXTERNAL BEAM RADIOTHERAPY [J].
GILL, SS ;
THOMAS, DGT ;
WARRINGTON, AP ;
BRADA, M .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1991, 20 (03) :599-603
[6]   A NONINVASIVE, RELOCATABLE STEREOTAXIC FRAME FOR FRACTIONATED RADIOTHERAPY AND MULTIPLE IMAGING [J].
GRAHAM, JD ;
WARRINGTON, AP ;
GILL, SS ;
BRADA, M .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1991, 21 (01) :60-62
[7]   MULTILEAF COLLIMATION VERSUS CONVENTIONAL SHIELDING BLOCKS - A TIME AND MOTION STUDY OF BEAM SHAPING IN RADIOTHERAPY [J].
HELYER, SJ ;
HEISIG, S .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1995, 37 (01) :61-64
[8]   A comparison of arc-based and static mini-multileaf collimator-based radiosurgery treatment plans [J].
Kubo, HD ;
Pappas, CTE ;
Wilder, RB .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1997, 45 (01) :89-93
[9]   STEREOTAXIC RADIOTHERAPY OF IRREGULAR TARGETS - A COMPARISON BETWEEN STATIC CONFORMAL BEAMS AND NONCOPLANAR ARCS [J].
LAING, RW ;
BENTLEY, RE ;
NAHUM, AE ;
WARRINGTON, AP ;
BRADA, M .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1993, 28 (03) :241-246
[10]   MULTILEAF COLLIMATION VERSUS ALLOY BLOCKS - ANALYSIS OF GEOMETRIC ACCURACY [J].
LOSASSO, T ;
KUTCHER, GJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1995, 32 (02) :499-506