Long-amplicon propidium monoazide-PCR enumeration assay to detect viable Campylobacter and Salmonella

被引:67
作者
Banihashemi, A. [1 ]
Van Dyke, M. I. [1 ]
Huck, P. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, NSERC Chair Water Treatment, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Campylobacter; polymerase chain reaction; propidium monoazide; Salmonella; viability; REAL-TIME PCR; LISTERIA-MONOCYTOGENES CELLS; ETHIDIUM MONOAZIDE; QUANTITATIVE PCR; CHICKEN CARCASSES; STRAND BREAKS; DEAD CELLS; DNA-DAMAGE; BACTERIA; QUANTIFICATION;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05382.x
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Aims The effect of amplicon length on the ability of propidium monoazide-PCR (PMA-PCR) to reliably quantify viable cells without interference from dead cells was tested on heat- and ultraviolet (UV)-killed Salmonella enterica and Campylobacter jejuni, two important enteric pathogens of concern in environmental, food and clinical samples. Methods and Results PMA treatment followed by quantitative PCR (qPCR) amplification of short DNA fragments (<200 bp) resulted in incomplete signal inhibition of heat-treated Salm. enterica (3 log reduction) and Camp. jejuni (1 log reduction), whereas PCR amplification of a long DNA fragment (1.5 and 1.6 kb) completely suppressed the dead cell signal. PMA pretreatment of UV-irradiated cells did not affect PCR amplification, but long-amplicon PCR was shown to detect only viable cells for these samples, even without the addition of PMA. Conclusions The long-amplicon PMA-PCR method was effective in targeting viable cells following heat and UV treatment and was applicable to enteric pathogens including Salmonella and Campylobacter that are difficult to enumerate using culture-based procedures. Significance and Impact of the Study PCR amplicon length is important for effective removal of the dead cell signal in PMA pretreatment methods that target membrane-damaged cells, and also for inactivation mechanisms that cause direct DNA damage.
引用
收藏
页码:863 / 873
页数:11
相关论文
共 49 条
[31]   Molecular monitoring of disinfection efficacy using propidium monoazide in combination with quantitative PCR [J].
Nocker, Andreas ;
Sossa, Katherine E. ;
Camper, Anne K. .
JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 2007, 70 (02) :252-260
[32]   Use of propidium monoazide for live/dead distinction in microbial ecology [J].
Nocker, Andreas ;
Sossa-Fernandez, Priscilla ;
Burr, Mark D. ;
Camper, Anne K. .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2007, 73 (16) :5111-5117
[33]   Comparison of propidium monoazide with ethidium monoazide for differentiation of live vs. dead bacteria by selective removal of DNA from dead cells [J].
Nocker, Andreas ;
Cheung, Ching-Ying ;
Camper, Anne K. .
JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 2006, 67 (02) :310-320
[34]   Ethidium monoazide for DNA-based differentiation of viable and dead bacteria by 5′-nuclease PCR [J].
Nogva, HK ;
Dromtorp, SM ;
Nissen, H ;
Rudi, K .
BIOTECHNIQUES, 2003, 34 (04) :804-+
[35]  
Oliver JD, 2005, J MICROBIOL, V43, P93
[36]   Enumeration of viable Listeria monocytogenes cells by real-time PCR with propidium monoazide and ethidium monoazide in the presence of dead cells [J].
Pan, Y. ;
Breidt, F., Jr. .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2007, 73 (24) :8028-8031
[37]   Use of Propidium Monoazide in Reverse Transcriptase PCR To Distinguish between Infectious and Noninfectious Enteric Viruses in Water Samples [J].
Parshionikar, Sandhya ;
Laseke, Ian ;
Fout, G. Shay .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2010, 76 (13) :4318-4326
[38]  
Rönner AC, 2007, J FOOD PROTECT, V70, P1373
[39]   Use of ethidium monoazide and PCR in combination for quantification of viable and dead cells in complex samples [J].
Rudi, K ;
Moen, B ;
Dromtorp, SM ;
Holck, AL .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2005, 71 (02) :1018-1024
[40]   Different Length (DL) qPCR for Quantification of Cell Killing by UV-induced DNA Damage [J].
Rudi, Knut ;
Hagen, Irina ;
Johnsrud, Bente Carina ;
Skjefstad, Guro ;
Tryland, Ingun .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2010, 7 (09) :3376-3381