Sensory MEG Responses Predict Successful and Failed Inhibition in a Stop-Signal Task

被引:69
作者
Boehler, C. N. [1 ]
Muente, T. F. [2 ]
Krebs, R. M. [3 ]
Heinze, H. -J. [1 ,3 ]
Schoenfeld, M. A. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Hopf, J. -M. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Inst Neurobiol, D-39118 Magdeburg, Germany
[2] Otto Von Guericke Univ, Dept Neuropsychol, D-39106 Magdeburg, Germany
[3] Otto Von Guericke Univ, Dept Neurol 2, D-39120 Magdeburg, Germany
[4] Kliniken Schmieder, D-78476 Allensbach, Germany
关键词
ATTENTION-DEFICIT/HYPERACTIVITY DISORDER; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS; CHOICE REACTION-TIME; MOTOR AREAS; COGNITIVE CONTROL; CINGULATE CORTEX; COUNTERMANDING SACCADES; PREFRONTAL CORTICES; CEREBRAL-CORTEX; ERROR-DETECTION;
D O I
10.1093/cercor/bhn063
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
In the present study magnetoencephalographic recordings were performed to investigate the neural mechanisms underlying the stopping of manual responses. Subjects performed in a Stop-signal task in which Go-stimuli (S1), requiring a rapid motor response, were sometimes rapidly followed by a Stop-stimulus (S2) indicating to withhold the already initiated response to S1. Success of stopping strongly depended on the early perceptual processing of S1 and S2 reflected by the magnetic N1 component. Enhanced processing of S1 facilitated the execution of the movement, whereas enhanced processing of S2 favored its inhibition. This suggests that the processing resources for the subsequent stimuli are limited and need to be shared. This sharing of resources appeared to arise from adjustments made on a trial-by-trial basis, in that systematic reaction time prolongations on Go-trials following Stop-trials versus following Go-trials were accompanied by attenuated sensory processing to the Go-stimulus similar to that seen in successful versus unsuccessful stopping in Stop-trials.
引用
收藏
页码:134 / 145
页数:12
相关论文
共 78 条
  • [11] Electrophysiological correlates for response inhibition in a Go/NoGo task
    Bokura, H
    Yamaguchi, S
    Kobayashi, S
    [J]. CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 112 (12) : 2224 - 2232
  • [12] Conflict monitoring and cognitive control
    Botvinick, MM
    Braver, TS
    Barch, DM
    Carter, CS
    Cohen, JD
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2001, 108 (03) : 624 - 652
  • [13] Inhibitory control in mind and brain: An interactive race model of countermanding Saccades
    Boucher, Leanne
    Palmeri, Thomas J.
    Logan, Gordon D.
    Schall, Jeffrey D.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2007, 114 (02) : 376 - 397
  • [14] Coull JT, 1998, J NEUROSCI, V18, P7426
  • [15] Intracortical inhibition during volitional inhibition of prepared action
    Coxon, James P.
    Stinear, Cathy M.
    Byblow, Winston D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2006, 95 (06) : 3371 - 3383
  • [16] Canceling planned action: An fMRI study of countermanding saccades
    Curtis, CE
    Cole, MW
    Rao, VY
    D'Esposito, M
    [J]. CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2005, 15 (09) : 1281 - 1289
  • [17] IN SEARCH OF THE POINT OF NO RETURN - THE CONTROL OF RESPONSE PROCESSES
    DEJONG, R
    COLES, MGH
    LOGAN, GD
    GRATTON, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1990, 16 (01) : 164 - 182
  • [18] Inhibitory attentional control in patients with frontal lobe damage
    Dimitrov, M
    Nakic, M
    Elpern-Waxman, J
    Granetz, J
    O'Grady, J
    Phipps, M
    Milne, E
    Logan, GD
    Hasher, L
    Grafman, J
    [J]. BRAIN AND COGNITION, 2003, 52 (02) : 258 - 270
  • [19] Inhibitory motor control in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Event-related potentials in the stop-signal paradigm
    Dimoska, A
    Johnstone, SJ
    Barry, RJ
    Clarke, AR
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 54 (12) : 1345 - 1354
  • [20] The auditory-evoked N2 and P3 components in the stop-signal task: Indices of inhibition, response-conflict or error-detection?
    Dimoska, Aneta
    Johnstone, Stuart J.
    Barry, Robert J.
    [J]. BRAIN AND COGNITION, 2006, 62 (02) : 98 - 112