Effect of blood vessels on measurement of nodule volume in a chest phantom

被引:21
作者
Ko, JP [1 ]
Marcus, R [1 ]
Bomsztyk, E [1 ]
Babb, JS [1 ]
Stefanescu, C [1 ]
Kaur, M [1 ]
Naidich, DP [1 ]
Rusinek, H [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Thorac Div, Dept Radiol, Med Ctr, New York, NY 10016 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2391041453
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose To identify, by using a chest phantom. whether vessels that contact long nodules measuring less than 5 mm in diameter will affect nodule volume assessment. Materials and Methods: Forty synthetic nodules (20 with ground-glass attenuation and 20 with solid attenuation) that measured less than 5 mm in diameter were placed into a chest phantom either adjacent to (n = 30) or isolated from (n = 10) synthetic vessels. Nodules were imaged by using low-dose (20 mAs) and diagnostic (120 mAs) multi-detector row computed tomography (CT). Nodules that were known to lie in direct contact with vessels were confirmed by visual inspection. Nontargeted 1.25 x 1.00-mm sections were analyzed with a three-dimensional computer-assisted method for measuring nodule volume. A mixed-model analysis of variance was used to examine the influence of several factors (eg. the presence of adjacent vessels; tube current-time product; and nodule attenuation, diameter, and location) on measurement error. Results The mean absolute error (MAE) for 811 nodules adjacent to vessels was 2,3 mm(3). which was higher than the MAE, for isolated nodules (1.9 mm(3)) (P < .001). This difference proved significant only rot, diagnostic CT (2.2 mm 3 for 3 for nodules' nodules adjacent to vessels vs 1.3 mm(3) for nodules isolated from vessels) (P < .05). A larger MAE was noted for nodules with ground-glass attenuation (2.3 mm(3)) versus those with solid attenuation (2.0 mm())(3). for increasing nodule volume (1.66 mm(3) for nodoles smaller than 20 mm(3) vs 2.83 mm(3) for nodules larger than 40 mm(3) and for posterior nodule location (P < .05). Conclusion: The presence of a vessel led to a small vessel significant increase in volume error on diagnostic-quality images. This represents less than one-third of flip overall error, even for nodules larger than 40 mm(3) or approximately 4 mm in diameter. This increase, however, may be more important For smaller nodules with errors or less than 3 mm(3).
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 85
页数:7
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
Beer AJ, 2002, RADIOLOGY, V225, P255
[2]   Interobserver and intraobserver variability in measurement of non-small-cell carcinoma lung lesions: Implications for assessment of tumor response [J].
Erasmus, JJ ;
Gladish, GW ;
Broemeling, L ;
Sabloff, BS ;
Truong, MT ;
Herbst, RS ;
Munden, RF .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (13) :2574-2582
[3]  
Fraser RS, 1999, Fraser and Pare's Diagnosis of Diseases of the Chest, V4th
[4]   Lung tumor growth: Assessment with CT - Comparison of diameter and cross-sectional area with volume measurements [J].
Jennings, SG ;
Winer-Muram, HT ;
Tarver, RD ;
Farber, MO .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 231 (03) :866-871
[5]   Small pulmonary nodules: Volume measurement at chest CT - Phantom study [J].
Ko, JP ;
Rusinek, H ;
Jacobs, EL ;
Babb, JS ;
Betke, M ;
McGuinness, G ;
Naidich, DP .
RADIOLOGY, 2003, 228 (03) :864-870
[6]   Small pulmonary nodules: Reproducibility of three-dimensional volumetric measurement and estimation of time to follow-up CT [J].
Kostis, WJ ;
Yankelevitz, DF ;
Reeves, AP ;
Fluture, SC ;
Henschke, CI .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 231 (02) :446-452
[7]   Three-dimensional segmentation and growth-rate estimation of small pulmonary nodules in helical CT images [J].
Kostis, WJ ;
Reeves, AP ;
Yankelevitz, DF ;
Henschke, CI .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2003, 22 (10) :1259-1274
[8]   CT-NUMBER VARIABILITY IN THORACIC GEOMETRY [J].
MCCULLOUGH, EC ;
MORIN, RL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1983, 141 (01) :135-140
[9]   Pulmonary nodules: Preliminary experience with three-dimensional evaluation [J].
Revel, MP ;
Lefort, C ;
Bissery, A ;
Bienvenu, M ;
Aycard, L ;
Chatellier, G ;
Frija, G .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 231 (02) :459-466
[10]   Are two-dimensional CT measurements of small noncalcified pulmonary nodules reliable? [J].
Revel, MP ;
Bissery, A ;
Bienvenu, M ;
Aycard, L ;
Lefort, C ;
Frija, G .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 231 (02) :453-458