Pre-lysis washing improves DNA extraction from a forest soil

被引:67
作者
He, JZ [1 ]
Xu, ZH
Hughes, J
机构
[1] Griffith Univ, Fac Environm Sci, Cooperat Res Ctr CRC Sustainable Prod Forestry, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia
[2] Griffith Univ, Fac Environm Sci, Australian Grad Environm Studies, Nathan, Qld 4111, Australia
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Ecoenvironm Sci Res Ctr, Beijing 100085, Peoples R China
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
DNA extraction; buffer washing; forest soil; humic substance; iron oxides; polymerase chain reaction;
D O I
10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.04.016
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
A pre-lysis buffer washing procedure was introduced to DNA extraction from a forest soil with high organic matter and iron oxide contents. Sodium phosphate of 0.1 M (pH 7.5) was used as a buffer to wash soil samples when subsequent lysis buffer was phosphate, and 20 mM EDTA (pH 7.5) was used when subsequent lysis buffer included EDTA. Initial experiments were not successful because the DNA extracts could not be amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The consideration of introducing a pre-lysis washing procedure was based on the idea that the washing should promote soil dispersion and homogeneity, decrease DNA adsorption by soil components (e.g. iron oxides), and remove covalent cations and those easily-dissolving organic compounds from the soil samples. Results revealed that humic substance content decreased by 31%, but DNA yield increased by 24% in the DNA extracts of the pre-lysis washing procedures, compared to the non-washing procedures. DNA extracted by the pre-washing procedure needed less purification for subsequent 18S and 16S rDNA PCR amplifications. It was recommended that the pre-lysis buffer washing should be used for DNA extraction from those difficult environmental samples, such as the forest soil with high contents of organic matter and iron oxides. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2337 / 2341
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   A strategy for optimizing quality and quantity of DNA extracted from soil [J].
Bürgmann, H ;
Pesaro, M ;
Widmer, F ;
Zeyer, J .
JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 2001, 45 (01) :7-20
[2]  
Frostegård Å, 1999, APPL ENVIRON MICROB, V65, P5409
[3]   Rapid method for coextraction of DNA and RNA from natural environments for analysis of ribosomal DNA- and rRNA-based microbial community composition [J].
Griffiths, RI ;
Whiteley, AS ;
O'Donnell, AG ;
Bailey, MJ .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2000, 66 (12) :5488-5491
[4]  
Holben W. E., 1994, METHODS SOIL ANAL 2, V5, P727
[5]   DNA PROBE METHOD FOR THE DETECTION OF SPECIFIC MICROORGANISMS IN THE SOIL BACTERIAL COMMUNITY [J].
HOLBEN, WE ;
JANSSON, JK ;
CHELM, BK ;
TIEDJE, JM .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1988, 54 (03) :703-711
[6]  
Isbell R. F., 1996, The Australian soil classification.
[7]   Comparison of different methods for the isolation and purification of total community DNA from soil [J].
Krsek, M ;
Wellington, EMH .
JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 1999, 39 (01) :1-16
[8]   DNA extraction from soils: Old bias for new microbial diversity analysis methods [J].
Martin-Laurent, F ;
Philippot, L ;
Hallet, S ;
Chaussod, R ;
Germon, JC ;
Soulas, G ;
Catroux, G .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2001, 67 (05) :2354-2359
[9]  
Miller DN, 1999, APPL ENVIRON MICROB, V65, P4715
[10]   THE EXTRACTION AND PURIFICATION OF MICROBIAL DNA FROM SEDIMENTS [J].
OGRAM, A ;
SAYLER, GS ;
BARKAY, T .
JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS, 1987, 7 (2-3) :57-66